東海心理学研究
Online ISSN : 2758-5522
Print ISSN : 1880-6422
15 巻
選択された号の論文の3件中1~3を表示しています
寄稿論文
  • 平石 賢二
    2022 年 15 巻 p. 1-
    発行日: 2022年
    公開日: 2023/05/10
    ジャーナル フリー
  • -東海心理学会の回顧と展望-
    辻 敬一郎
    原稿種別: 寄稿
    2022 年 15 巻 p. 2-8
    発行日: 2022年
    公開日: 2023/05/10
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    This article reviews the 70-year history of the Tokai Psychological Association (TPA). It started in 1951 as a regional academic society, serving the psychologists’ community in the Tokai region. Since then, members have founded a common ground for scholarly communication and exchange, providing a forum for presenting their research, and engaging in symposia at annual conferences and monthly meetings. However, in the last few decades of the 20th century, TPA was faced with much difficulty, due to the successive establishment of many field-specific academic organizations, both national and regional. These organizations can be categorized into three types; interdisciplinary academic societies for corresponding to paradigm shifts (Type-Ⅰ); societies corresponding to the increasingly fractionalized subfields of psychology (Type-II); and societies responding to the social demands of the times (Type-Ⅲ). Without doubt, the rise of these organizations has influenced the role and state of TPA. The future of TPA should consider taking on complementary roles in coexistence with these field-specific societies. In particular, it is suggested for TPA to take actions toward promoting itself to social and educational issues of the local communities. To attain such new goals, the formation of a master-planning committee, along with fortifying the network for cooperation amongst similarly regionally-based organizations are warranted.
原著論文
  • -意思決定の結果及びプロセスに対する後悔に着目して-
    伊藤 拓, 瀬戸 美奈子
    原稿種別: 原著
    2022 年 15 巻 p. 9-16
    発行日: 2022年
    公開日: 2023/05/10
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    This study focused on regret about decision making under consultation with a friend. We investigated the relationship between two kinds of regret (regret for the consultation and regret for the result), the decision maker’s Locus of Control, and the opinions offered by the friend (the opinion influencing the final decision or not). One-hundred-ninety university students read two scenarios, then filled out a questionnaire. The results showed people with high external control felt more regret for their decisions than people with internal control. Furthermore, people felt more regret for consultation when the opinion the friend gave was instrumental in the final decision of the decision maker than not. These results suggest the factors that influence each regret are different and, that it is effective to seek opinions from others, considering various options toward partially reducing regret in decision making.
feedback
Top