In science education, one crucial competency is the ability to “analyze and interpret the results of observations and experimentations.” This study investigates how to utilize tables or graphs from “Basic Biology” authorized textbooks for upper secondary school students as an example. The aim of this study is to clarify how the tables or graphs published in such textbooks are utilized. The surveyed textbooks had an average of 296 charts each, of which 36 were graphs or tables. The graphs or tables only listed in the text accounted for 16% of all charts.
Regarding how these graphs and tables are cited in the text, 6% “appeared as reference material for the content of the text,” while both “appeared as a summary of the description in the text” and “there exists a description of the graphs or tables” represented 12% each, and “appeared as the basis of the description in the text” had the highest incidence, at 71%. Regarding the graphs that “appeared as the basis of the description in the text” or those for which “there exists an explanation of the graphs or tables,” 66% of them were referred to in the text.
It has been pointed out that learning biology involves a significant amount of memorization, to the detriment of logic. Reading the graphs in the textbook and confirming the description in the text increased scientific validity. In addition, since this report focuses on the utilization of graphs, we hope it will be used for future lesson planning.
View full abstract