In this paper, we investigate how the wage distribution of employees with a mental disability (i.e., impairment caused by a mental illness) has changed in the wake of the sharp increase in the number of these employees after the application of the disability employment obligation to them and the increase in the mandatory employment rate under the revised Act to Facilitate the Employment of Persons with Disabilities. For our analysis, we used two microdata sets, namely, the Disabled Employment Survey (2013, 2018) and the Life Difficulty Survey (2011, 2016), which are conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. There are three major findings. First, on average, workers with a mental disability, whose disability was recognized by their employers prior to hiring, experienced statistically significant wage increases between2011 and 2018. Second, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition of wage increases revealed that the regional minimum wage was the main driving factor (compositional factor), and the change in the wage function parameter of persons with the mildest (grade 3) mental disabilities had some positive effects (structural factor). Third, these wage increases of employees with mental disabilities were spoiled by the decrease of the parameter of the wavefunction (structural factor) in large enterprises with more than one thousand employees. The wage increase for employees with the mildest (grade 3) mental disabilities could be explained by the following factors: Between 2013 and 2018, the number of persons newly certified for grade 3 mental disability has increased sharply, especially among the working-age population, compared with more severe mental disability levels. The proportion of employees with grade 3 mental disability has also increased among the total number of employees with disabilities. Furthermore, in the same period, as the population of employees with physical disabilities under the age of 65 years continues to decrease as these workers retire, employers might experience difficulty filling these vacancies to meet the obligatory disability employment rate. Employers would then fill vacancies with workers with the mildest (grade 3) mental disabilities and would expect high productivity relative to hiring other workers with more severe mental disability. This would explain the wage increases for employees with grade 3 mental disabilities. However, compared with employees with physical disabilities, the wage distribution of employees with mental disabilities is much lower and closer to that of employees with intellectual disabilities. Thus, the abovementioned wage increases would not be sufficient to bridge the gap between the low pension benefits (e.g., the grade 3 employees’ disability pension for the mildest disabilities) and the minimum income for people with relatively mild mental disability, as indicated by previous research. The high correlation with regional minimum wages may be an indication that wage levels are quite low. The extent to which these wage increases reduce the risk of poverty for people with mental disabilities remains to be investigated in future studies.
View full abstract