Recently, there has been much discussion on Health Care Reform in Japan in order to control health care expenditures. In this discussion, the stratification of health care has been examined, but it has been criticized extensively as being against the principle of equality, opposed to social consciousness and resulting in rising health care costs. This paper examines those reasons and the disadvantages of the nonstratification. The conclusions are as follows:
1) It may be reasonable to hold the principle of equality in which the whole nation has an equal right to receive a high level of health care. But this does not mean that the whole nation has an equal right to receive the same level of health care.
2) Non-stratification may contribute to the control of health care expenditures. On the other hand, it may bring with it a paternalistic policy, lower the quality of health care services, lower efficiency and obstruct empowerment of the citizens.
View full abstract