In recent decades, clinicians have given greater attention to the importance of minimizing and avoiding exposure of patients to allogeneic(donor)blood transfusion. However, caring for patients without blood transfusion can sometimes pose a challenge to clinicians. Healthcare providers may encounter this clinical scenario when patients object to blood transfusion therapy for religious, cultural, or health reasons, when blood bank inventories are low, or when allogeneic blood is not available (such as during a disaster or an epidemic). Respect for patient autonomy upholds fundamental human rights. Thus, clinical strategies for blood conservation and optimal management of patients’ own blood are relevant to all anesthesiologists.
Mounting evidence published in the medical literature demonstrates that even major medical and surgical interventions can be successfully performed without blood transfusion. This is achieved through the rigorous and systematic use of combinations of clinical strategies that treat anemia, manage coagulopathy, and minimize blood loss. The objective of such strategies, tailored to each clinical situation, is to minimize blood loss, optimize autologous blood management, support hematopoiesis, and enhance tolerance of anemia. Moreover, studies indicate that the clinical and economic outcomes of such care are comparable to or superior to those of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusions.
View full abstract