Factor VIII : C (FVIII : C) inhibitor expressed by Bethesda unit had been widely assayed by Bethesda method. In recent years, Nijmengen method has been recommended by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis because Bethesda method showed less specificity in the low levels of FVIII:C inhibitors. However, some kinds of modified Bethesda methods also exist in Japan, which have been afraid that their sensitivities are different. In this report, we compared four FVIII : C inhibitor assays of Bethesda (B), Nijmengen (N), and two (S and M) of modified Bethesda methods, using the samples obtained from Haemophilia A patients without inhibitor. The two modified methods utilize the pre-treated plasma with inactivation of coagulation factors at 56°C in testing samples, i.e. S method is using FVIII deficient plasma with a treatment of 56°C, and M method is using normal plasma with a treatment of 56°C, as a control.
In the results of pH values and FVIII : C activities obtained from the four methods, all of the reaction mixtures after 2hrs at 37°C incubation had changed into higher pH value, the pH values of those in S and M methods were high before the testing incubation. Especially in B methods, the pH discrepancy between tests and controls was the largest of >0.5, though their pH levels hardly changed between before and after the incubation. On the other hand, the FVIII:C activities were similar among the four methods, however, the remaining FVIII:C in the control of B method showed a remarkable high level of 90.4%. And the both of pH values and FVIII:C activities obtained from the four methods showed a negative relationship (correlation r=0.878).
In the comparison of the four methods using plasma samples from 13 patients of Haemophilia A without inhibitor, only B method showed a high false positive rate of 61.5%. Moreover, in the plasma samples with FVIII:C activity of >10%, N method showed higher levels of residual FVIII:C, the sensitivity for the inhibitor in that range was lesser than that of S and M methods with the inactivation.
These results have suggest that understanding the characteristics of FVIII:C inhibitor assays is important to evaluate the patients with FVIII:C inhibitor.
View full abstract