To investigate medical practice for DIC of clinicians, we evaluated the results of questionnaire at Tokai DIC up to Date meeting in April, 2005. Fibrinogen and the FDP measurement of overtime were possible at only 67% of institutions where surgeon belonged to. For pharmacological approach for DIC, the frequency of use of the unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin were much different between departments. Composition proteinase inhibitors and antithrombin were used more than 90% doctors. But 41% of doctors performed antifibrinolytic therapy in DIC cases. Preference of drugs for DIC in cases of DIC suspected and DIC defined were much different.
In cases except leukemia, DIC treatment was started in Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare DIC diagnostic criteria at 3 or 4 points by surgeons and at 4-6 points other department doctors, before DIC was not diagnosed by the criteria. On the other hand, DIC treatment was started at JAAM DIC diagnostic criteria at 4 points that was definite DIC diagnostic criteria. This questionnaire evaluation revealed big difference in DIC treatment, therefore, DIC treatment practical guidelines is necessary and should be constituted promptly.
View full abstract