Journal of Rural Economics
Online ISSN : 2188-1057
Print ISSN : 0387-3234
ISSN-L : 0387-3234
Volume 89, Issue 4
Vol.89 No.4
Displaying 1-16 of 16 articles from this issue
full-paper
  • Risako TADA, Junichi ITO
    2018 Volume 89 Issue 4 Pages 261-276
    Published: March 25, 2018
    Released on J-STAGE: August 21, 2019
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Japan has made a gradual shift in agricultural policy away from a price support to income compensation program, in which professional farms (Ninaite) depend heavily on direct payments for their livelihoods. The direct payment scheme is not only in line with international treaties agreed on at the WTO, but also a transparent system from taxpayers’ viewpoint. However, it remains to be examined empirically to what extent the scheme affects farm managerial performance and whether the targeting of subsidization is consistent with the policy ideal of fostering as many Ninaite as possible. Using a stochastic frontier production function, we evaluate the causal effect of direct payments on technical efficiency and compare the efficiency among various managerial types. Our estimation result shows that more subsidized farms are less technically efficient for BC (biochemical) and M (machinery) processes and that individual farms with a relatively large size are comparable with community-based farms (amalgamations of small farms) in terms of technical efficiency.

    Download PDF (1693K)
research trends
  • Nanami TOISHI
    2018 Volume 89 Issue 4 Pages 277-290
    Published: March 25, 2018
    Released on J-STAGE: August 21, 2019
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    This paper aims to examine whether the discussion about the definition of early modern village (近世村), oaza (大字) and rural community (農業集落) is useful for improvement of the autonomous village theory, reviewing Japanese rural history from a long-term perspective. In 1987 Hitoshi Saitoh set up a theory that existence of early modern villages, which improved the ability of autonomy through negotiating with rulers, caused the great success of the Japanese cooperative movement. This theory was named the autonomous village theory. It is not only applied by scholars who are interested in foreign countries, including Vietnam or Uzbekistan, but also opposed by many Japanese historians, whose major is Modern Japan. The opposition leaders focus on one of Saitoh’s arguments that the unit of cooperative movement at the beginning should be the early modern village and it was an oaza and rural community, too. Trying to take advantage of this “weak point”, the opposition leaders insist that Saitoh’s other arguments are also wrong, showing statistical analyses of the relationships among the early modern village, oaza and rural community, ignoring the historical contents of these three kinds of units. A review of historical studies of Japanese rural history suggests that not only administrative units but also agricultural production units had been formed dynamically from ancient times until modern times, repeatedly splitting and integrating. So the relationships among the early modern village, oaza and rural community are never historically consistent. In conclusion, the criticism based on statistical analyses is not fatal to the most important original arguments of the autonomous village theory and is limited to partial discussion.

    Download PDF (1423K)
research letter
feedback
Top