Rectangular hollow section column-to-wide flange beam connections are commonly used in moment resisting frames in Japan. In such a connection, the moment in the beam web is transmitted to the column through the column skin plate. When the thickness of the tube wall is thin, out of plane deformation of the skin plate occurs easily, so the joint efficiency in beam web is low. The connection coefficient
a is defined as the ratio of the maximum strength of beam connection to the full plastic strength of the beam, where the former is calculated considering the joint efficiency in beam web. The plastic deformation capacity of the connection is low when the connection coefficient
a is small. For beam-to-column connections with low joint efficiency, the strength of the panel is relatively small due to small thickness. As a result, the panel might yield earlier than the beam. In this case, the plastic deformation capacity of the connection might increase. Hence, different failure modes have to be taken into consideration when evaluate the plastic deformation capacity of such connections. Furthermore, for moment resisting frames consisted of WF beam and RHS column with low joint efficiency in beam web, it is not clear how the yield of the panel would affect the seismic performance of the whole frame. In this study, to evaluate the plastic deformation capacity of the beam-to-column connection with low joint efficiency in the beam web considering that the panel yields, cyclic loading tests of beam-to-column connections were conducted. Moreover, nonlinear time-history response analyses of multi-story steel moment frames were conducted to assess whether the connections reach their ultimate states during earthquakes.
Four beam-to-column connection specimens with same beam section and different panel section were tested. The test results showed that as the connection coefficient
a decreased, the panel-to-beam strength ratio
Rp also decreased. As a result, the plastic deformation capacity of the connection increased due to yielding of the panel. In this case, the ratio of energy dissipation of the panel and that of the whole connection increased. When
Rp was about 1.1, the ratio of energy dissipation of the panel and that of the connection was about 0.5.
In the nonlinear response analyses, moment resisting frames with 3 stories, 6 stories, 9 stories, and 12 stories were employed. The panel-to-beam strength ratio
Rp in these frame verified from 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, to 1.5. Five seismic records with different amplification factors were input during the analyses. From the analytical results of 16 frames, it is concluded that (1) under Level 2 earthquakes (PGV=50cm/s), when the connection coefficient
a is smaller than 1.2, “Class C” (defined by the Japanese design code) beam members are not likely to reach their ultimate states. However, “Class A” beam members might reach failure. (2) under Level 2 earthquakes (PGV=50cm/s), when the connection coefficient
a is over 1.2, “Class A” beam members are also considered to be safe. (3) under Level 3 earthquakes (PGV=75cm/s), even when the connection coefficient
a is larger than 1.2, both “Class C” and “Class A” are likely to reach failure. Nevertheless, if the panel-to-beam strength ratio
Rp is small enough that the panel is yielded to a certain level, both classes of beam members would not fail during the earthquake.
View full abstract