The decision to perform an intervention for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) requires careful weighing of the risks of early intervention against those of watchful observation, and the optimal timing of intervention remains controversial. With improvements in surgical and postoperative care, long-term survival after surgical aortic valve (AV) replacement (AVR) is excellent in low-risk patients, and the emergence of transcatheter AVR may change the thresholds for early preemptive intervention, although a durability issue has to be resolved. A watchful observation strategy also has a risk of sudden death, irreversible myocardial damage, and increase in operative risk while waiting for symptoms to develop. We have been waiting for a prospective randomized trial to solve the intense debate between early AVR and watchful observation, and the RECOVERY (Randomized Comparison of Early Surgery versus Conventional Treatment in Very Severe Aortic Stenosis) trial provides the evidence to support early AVR for asymptomatic severe AS. Risk assessment with severity of AS and staging classification may help to facilitate the identification of patients who may benefit from early intervention. Based on the results of the RECOVERY trial, early surgical AVR is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with very severe AS (aortic jet velocity ≥4.5 m/s) and low surgical risk. Further evidence is required to extend the indications of surgical AVR and to consider transcatheter AVR in asymptomatic patients with severe AS.

Background:Coexistent pulmonary hypertension with severe aortic stenosis confers a greater risk of mortality for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this patient population, the impact of significant decoupling between pulmonary artery diastolic and pulmonary capillary wedge, as it relates to clinical risk, remained uncertain.

Methods and Results:Patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR and completed pre-procedural and post-procedural invasive hemodynamic assessments with right heart catheterization were retrospectively assessed. The impact of post-TAVR decoupling, defined as a pressure difference ≥3 mmHg, on 2-year all-cause mortality or risk of heart failure admission was analyzed. Among 77 included patients (median age 86 years, 23 men), 16 had post-TAVR decoupling. The existence of post-TAVR decoupling was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint (44% vs. 7%, P=0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 5.87 (95% confidence interval 1.58–21.9, P=0.008).

Conclusions:A greater risk of worse outcomes in those with post-TAVR decoupling was observed. A therapeutic strategy for post-TAVR decoupling and its clinical implication need to be created and investigated in the future.

Background:Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAo-TAVR) is an alternative to peripheral or transapical TAVR. The procedural feasibility, safety, and midterm outcomes of TAo-TAVR were investigated in this study.

Methods and Results:Eighty-four consecutive patients underwent TAo-TAVR from 2011 to 2021. Their median age was 83 years (interquartile range, 80–87 years). The Edwards SAPIEN and Medtronic CoreValve devices were used in 45 (53.6%) and 38 (45.2%) patients, respectively. The surgical approach was a right mini-thoracotomy in 43 patients (51.2%) and partial sternotomy in 4 patients (4.8%). The remaining 37 patients (44.0%) underwent full sternotomy because of concomitant off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. VARC-3 device success was achieved in 77 patients (91.7%). Valve migration occurred in 3 patients (3.6%) using a first-generation CoreValve device, necessitating implantation of a second valve. No aortic annulus rupture, aortic dissection, or coronary orifice occlusion occurred. Conversion to surgery was required for 1 patient because of uncontrollable bleeding. Only 1 in-hospital death occurred. New pacemaker implantation was required in 6 patients (7.1%). Echocardiography at discharge showed no or trivial paravalvular leak (PVL) in 58 patients (69.0%), mild PVL in 23 (27.4%), and mild to moderate PVL in 2 (2.4%) patients. The 1- and 3-year incidence of cardiovascular death was 1.6% and 4.8%, respectively, with no structural valve deterioration.

Conclusions:TAo-TAVR is feasible and safe with satisfactory midterm outcomes using both currently available devices.

Background:The MitraClip NT System was approved for marketing in Japan on October 31, 2017, and a prospective, multi-center, single-arm Post-Marketing use Surveillance (PMS) study was launched in 2018. This is the first report of the Japan PMS study with 1-year subject outcomes.

Methods and Results:A total of 500 patients were registered between April 2018 and January 2019. Patients with symptomatic chronic moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe mitral regurgitation (MR; 4+), MR with a Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) replacement score of ≥8%, or presence of 1 pre-defined risk factor were enrolled. Primary outcome measures included acute procedural success (APS), and rate of Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) at 30 days. The overall cohort was elderly (77.9±9.48 years) with functional MR etiology in 71.6% of the subjects. The majority of subjects were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV (68.9%), with mean STS replacement score of 11.95±9.66%. The APS rate was 91.13% and the 30-day SLDA rate was 1.21%. Durable MR reduction was achieved with 88.1% of subjects at MR ≤2+ at 1 year. Significant improvement in the functional capacity was observed, with 93% of subjects at NYHA class I/II at 1 year.

Conclusions:In the Japan PMS experience, the MitraClip procedure resulted in improvements in MR severity, with significantly improved functional outcomes. These results demonstrate safety and efficacy of MitraClip therapy in the eligible Japanese population.

Background:The additional effects of single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) on anticoagulant therapy are still unclear in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after bioprosthetic valve replacement.

Methods and Results:We conducted a subanalysis of a multicenter, retrospective, observational registry of patients with bioprosthetic valves and AF in Japan. Patients administered anticoagulants alone comprised the ACA group (n=107), and patients given concomitant SAPT and anticoagulant therapy comprised the On SAPT group (n=82). The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism, and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding. The observation period was 46.3±24.6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 12 patients, and the cumulative incidence of primary efficacy events was significantly higher in the ACA group compared with the On SAPT group (P=0.039). The primary safety endpoint occurred in 22 patients, and the cumulative incidence of primary safety events was similar between groups (P=0.66). No differences between the groups were observed for cardiac events.

Conclusions:Additional SAPT on anticoagulant therapy in patients with bioprosthetic valves and AF was associated with a reduction in stroke/systemic embolic events, although the cumulative incidence of bleeding was similar, regardless of additional SAPT. These findings suggest that additional SAPT on anticoagulant therapy may be safe and effective in real-world clinical settings.

Background:The clinical significance of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) has not been well addressed in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods and Results:We analyzed 3,815 patients from a retrospective multicenter registry of severe AS in Japan (CURRENT AS registry). We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with moderate/severe MR and with none/mild MR according to the initial treatment strategy (initial aortic valve replacement [AVR] or conservative strategy). The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization. At baseline, moderate/severe MR was present in 227/1,197 (19%) patients with initial AVR strategy and in 536/2,618 (20%) patients with a conservative strategy. The crude cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in patients with moderate/severe MR than in those with none/mild MR, regardless of the initial treatment strategy (25.2% vs. 14.4%, P<0.001 in the initial AVR strategy, and 63.3% vs. 40.7%, P<0.001 in the conservative strategy). After adjusting confounders, moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure in the initial AVR strategy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–1.83, P=0.69), and in the conservative strategy (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93–1.37, P=0.22).

Conclusions:Concomitant moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure regardless of the initial treatment strategy.

Background:Although bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacements are becoming more common within our aging society, there are limited prospective data on the appropriate antithrombotic therapy for East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and BPV replacement. Antithrombotic therapy and thrombotic and hemorrhagic event rates in Japanese patients with AF and BPV replacement are investigated.

Methods and Results:This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with BPV replacement and AF. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Of the 894 patients analyzed, 54.7%, 29.4%, and 9.6%, were treated with warfarin-based therapy, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-based therapy, or antiplatelet therapy without anticoagulants, respectively; 6.3% did not receive any antithrombotic drugs. The mean observation period was 15.3±4.0 months. The event rates for stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were 1.95%/year and 1.86%/year, respectively. The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios for DOAC vs. warfarin were 1.02 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.30–3.41 [P=0.979]) for systemic embolic events and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.29–3.16 [P=0.945]) for major bleeding.

Conclusions:Approximately 30% of patients with AF and BPV replacement were treated with DOAC. The risks of major bleeding and stroke or systemic embolism were similar between warfarin- and DOAC-treated patients with AF who had BPV replacement. Treatment with DOACs could be an alternative to warfarin in this population.

Background:This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term patient outcomes and durability of the Mosaic mitral porcine bioprosthesis in the Japan Mosaic valve long-term multicenter study.

Methods and Results:The medical records of 390 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis at 10 centers in Japan (1999–2014) were reviewed. Patient data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture software. Patient survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) and valve-related reoperation and death were determined using actuarial methods. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the cohort was 73 (69–77) years. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 4.83 (1.84–8.26) years. The longest follow-up period was 15.8 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.4%. The 12-year actuarial survival rate was 54.1±4.5%, and the freedom from valve-related death was 85.3±3.4%. The freedom from reoperation at 12 years was 74.3±5.7%. The freedom from SVD at 12 years was 81.4±6.6% for patients aged ≥65 years and 71.6±11.1% for those aged <65 years. The median (IQR) mean pressure gradient was 4.1 (3.0–6.0) and 5.6 (4.0–6.7) mmHg at 1 and 10 years, respectively. The median (IQR) effective orifice area was 1.7 (1.4–2.0) and 1.4 (1.2–1.6) cm²at 1 and 10 years, respectively.

Conclusions:The Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis offered satisfactory long-term outcomes for up to 12 years.

Background:The prevalence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) among hospitalized psychiatric patients after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains unclear.

Methods and Results:We retrospectively investigated the prevalence of proximal DVT after COVID-19 infection among 50 hospitalized patients in a Japanese psychiatric hospital that in which a COVID-19 cluster developed between August and September 2020. The prevalence of proximal DVT was 10.0%. Patients with proximal DVT had a lower body weight and higher maximum D-dimer levels and International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE scores.

Conclusions:After COVID-19 infection, hospitalized psychiatric patients are at high risk of DVT and should be carefully followed up.

Background:Cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are critical for prognosis but have not been elucidated in Japan.

Methods and Results:The COVID-19 Registry Japan, which included data from 19,853 individuals at the end of 2020, was analyzed. The incidences of cardiovascular complications were 0.098% for myocarditis/pericarditis/cardiomyopathy, 0.48% for ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, 0.17% for myocardial ischemia, 0.062% for endocarditis, 0.59% for deep vein thrombosis, 0.19% for pulmonary embolism, and 0.37% for cerebral infarction/hemorrhage. Excluding endocarditis, all complications were associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions:Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 were infrequent in Japan but were associated with poor prognosis.