Through the middle ages and early modern times, the actual clinical entity of the ulcer was not identified, but the symptoms associated with ulcer, namely epigastralgia and hematemesis, were well known. The ulcer therapy in those times meant a treatment of such symptoms, and folk medicines and incantation were mainly used. In Japan, Kampo (Chinese medicine) was also the main form of therapy, but it is doubtful whether correct medical treatments were provided.
In more recent times, autopsy findings finally identified the ulcer as a clinical manifestation. However, due to the fact that pathognomy was in its infancy at that time, the correct diagnosis of ulcers was not possible, and all ulcers were believed to be accompanied with hematemesis. Also, there was no concept of differential diagnosis, so any case of bleeding was considered as having an ulcer as the origin, and all such patients were candidates for ulcer treatment. In the late Meiji period, antacids were used as the primary treatment regimes. However, X-ray and endoscopy had not then been developed, and doubtful diagnosis or a variety of uncertain ulcer treatments were provided. In 1957, the flexible gastroscope was reported in Germany, and the importance of gastroscopy was realized. However, there were few facilities where gastroscopy could be performed, so diagnosis with gastroscopy was mostly an ideal, but unfulfillable, plan. The practical application of X-ray diagnosis lagged far behind. In Japan, X-ray screening for ulcers was finally put to practical use in the postwar period around 1955, though the accuracy of diagnosis was less than sufficient. It is therefore safe to say that the correct treatment being performed on the basis of clinical diagnosis had little possibility. Although gastroscopy was started on a trial basis in a very few facilities, full-scale application of endoscopy was only realized after the practical use of the gastrocamera become common around 1958. As to anti-ulcer agents, anticholinergic medication emerged long after the end of World War II, and then various types of anticholinergic agents were developed one after another. As a result, the combination of an anticholinergic agent and antacid became common and more mucosal protection drugs began to be developed. However, the significance of these steps has faded and they have lost their meaning in today's ulcer treatment regimens. The H
2 receptor antagonist and then PPI have appeared in recent years, and the correct medical care of ulcers began to be performed based on the correct diagnosis, though the problem of recurrence was left unsolved. Therafter, the problem seemed to be solved with the emergence eradication therapy for
Helicobacter pylori, however, another problem of esophagitis after eradication has cropped up. In this paper, the author mainly discuss the progress in ulcer therapy and its relation with endoscopy.
View full abstract