Background : Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with transnasal endoscopy has been reported to be a safe method. However, limited information is available on which PEG method is the most suitable. Our aim was to compare safety between the modified introducer (I) method and the pull (P) method in PEG with transnasal endoscopy.
Patients and methods : Patients with indications for PEG were prospectively randomly assigned into two groups : I method and P method. Patients in both groups underwent PEG with a button-type catheter of the same diameter (24 Fr) by transnasal endoscopy. We evaluated hemodynamic changes (blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral blood oxygen saturation) and complications (pneumoperitoneum, intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage and peristomal infection). The primary outcome was to evaluate the frequency of complications.
Results : Ninety-nine patients were enrolled (I method : 49 patients, P method : 50 patients). Procedures were successful in all patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in patients' background and hemodynamic changes. However, the frequency of pneumoperitoneum was significantly higher in the I method group than in the P method group (p<0.05). Furthermore, one death occurred in the I method group, which may have been caused by massive pneumoperitoneum.
Conclusion : The frequency of pneumoperitoneum was higher in the I method group. Therefore, attention should be paid when selecting the PEG method for patients at risk for hemodynamic changes and pulmonary problems caused by pneumoperitoneum.
View full abstract