Since the second half of the 19th century the housing problem of working class has been brought into focus of the social policies in Germany as rapid industrialization and urbanization progressed. This led to the appearance of nonprofit building activities in order to supply affordable dwellings for the IOXV income families as an alternative housing allocation process to private housing market. These activities were undertaken by various types of organizations : municipal government, industrial or mining companies, housing co-operatives (Baugenossenschaft) and nonprofit building societies (gemeinutzige Baugesellschaft). We can regard these activities before World War I as important works because there were no national housing acts till 1918. The purpose of this paper is to assess the significance of these nonprofit housing strategies in those days, especially between 1880-1910, from the case study of industrial city Essen, Ruhr Area. In such a case we should pay attention to consider them with relation to city planning, spatial differentiation of the internal urban structure, that is to say, in their spatial context. The main results of this study are as follows : l) The first step of nonprofit building activities in this area began in186O's. Almost all the dwellings built until l890's were company houses supplied by Krupp and other major industrial or mining companies to secure skilled workers. Till 1910 more than 9,500 housing units were built by them. 2) On the other hand, the activities of housing co-operatives and nonprofit building societies entered this field in 189O's and participated actively since the early years of the 20th century. They have built a little amount of housing units, but supplied them mainly to lower middle class and skilled workers at lower rents compared to those in private market which were subsidized by municipal government, Krupp and financial institutions. 3) The direct municipal housing policy-council housing provision was restricted to build for municipal government employees and to relieve the poor in the municipality. In contrast, indirect municipal housing policies, consisted of financial support and housing-lot supply to nonprofit housing activities, were also put into practice closely connected with land policy and city extension planning. Therefore these policies have contributed not only to the improvement of housing conditions but also to the realization of desirable neighborhood especially in the southern suburb in future. Nevertheless they were focused mainly on the promotion for the middle class housing, so there was a limit to the improvement for working class housing condition.
View full abstract