Previous researches on supporting EFL (English as a Foreign Language) reading showed that Kit Build concept mapping (KB-mapping) method has better efficiency than Scratch Build concept mapping (SB-mapping) method in recalling the comprehended information two weeks later. In this research, we set out to investigate the following research question "Why KB-mapping method has better efficiency than SB-mapping method in recalling the comprehended information two weeks later?". One of the common comprehension styles in the EFL reading comprehension tasks is the sentence-by-sentence, where learners understand the text by closely following each sentence in the text. Learners will be able to sentence-by-sentence answer the Comprehension Test (CT) just after the reading, but many investigations indicated that, this understanding could not be kept for a longer time as is the case in the Delayed CT (DCT). We have an assumption that KB-mapping method promotes a learner to read not sentence-by-sentence, although SB-mapping method does not promote same as KB-mapping method. In order to confirm this assumption, we conducted an experiment to compare the learner's comprehension with KB-mapping and SB-mapping methods. The outcome of the experiment confirms our previous results regarding the efficiency of KB-mapping. Moreover, the analysis of the progress of map building gives a proof that although KB-mapping method helps the learners to avoid the sentence-by-sentence comprehension style the SB-mapping method could not help the learners to escape from this style of comprehension.
View full abstract