Problems of First-stage Standerized Achievement Examination conducted in the period of 1979-1982 were analysed and the results were as follows ; (1) Rough classification of problems showed a relatively high percentage for wide-scope problems covering various areas. We welcome this trend for avoiding over-specialized problems. (2) Since the main purpose of the achievement test is to assess daily understanding of students, simple and non-twisted questions are desirable. Most of questions so far given seem to fulfil this propose. (3) The question-form has to be objective because the processing of enormous number of test-results inevitably depends upon the computer system. Of some forms of objective test, a multiple-choice form is considered most reliable for assessing student's understanding, but a true-false form has no merit. Questions of the latter form have shown a yearly decrease, but still survive. Questions of this form should not be adopted. (4) There have been the differences in difficulty-levels among problems of physics, chemistry, biology and geography. Being influenced by a difficulty factor, applicants for physics and chemistry were decreasing year by year. This trend should be improved in the near future. Problems of entrance examinations conducted by 30 national, 3 public and 9 private universities in the period of 1975〜1981 were analysed and the results were as follows. (1) A percentage test-items selected from contents of Chemistry II showed a sudden increase in 1979, the opening year of First-stage Standerized Achievement Examination, and has kept high level since then. (2) According to "Course of Study" published by the ministry of Education, problems given in 1978〜1981 were further classified into every section of the course to which they belong. The test-items selected from sections of "Oxidation and Reduction" and "Properties of Substances" in Chemistry I, and of "Chemical Equilibrium" and "Carbon Compounds" in Chemistry II, showed relatively high percentages. (3) Problems that seemed to be inadequate in our judgment were picked up by following bases; (i) Problems with vague of meaningless aims (ii) Problems without sufficient conditions to be given, (iii) Problems which assess a remembering ability only, (iv) Problems that exceed the scope and level of high school education, (v) Problems with too lengthy descriptions. We demonstrated inadequancy of these problems by giving typical examples of each group. (4) Problems of national and public universities and those of private universities given in 1981 were separately classified into three groups of reasonable, inadequate, and difficult problems in our judgment. A combined percentage of inadequate and difficult problems for national and public universities reached 24.5%, exceeding 18.2% for private universities.
View full abstract