In recent human geography, “place” has been redefined as follows: first, “place” contains internal differences and conflicts; and second, “place” is constructed by linking that area to places beyond. This paper aims at confirming the above definition of place through a case study of the Kamagasaki neighborhood in Osaka. Kamagasaki is an area in which day-laborers are concentrated and widely known as a day-labor market. This paper especially focuses on the area in the 1970s and the past decade and analyzes the process in which the identities of each of the area's social groups have been represented. It also shows how place names, such as Kamagasaki and Airin, and their borders functioned in the process of identity formation.
In the 1970s, the Kamagasaki Joint Struggle Meeting formed the identity of the labor movement by opposing the government or administration. On the other hand, Cheap Inn's Trade Association formed local residents' identity by opposing the labor movement. After 1974, when the Kamagasaki Joint Struggle Meeting basically ended,
Romusha Tosei magazine inherited this group's identity in opposition to that of the local residents. The decade-long dispute over the place names “Kamagasaki” and “Airin” was reignited repeatedly.
After 2000, this paper focuses on community movements, revival of the regional economy, and art movements in this area and investigates how the place names have changed in those activities. In community movements and in regional economy revival activities, new place names such as Haginochaya and Shin-Imamiya have been established. In art movements, “Kamagasaki” was given a new meaning by artists active in the area. These names have been established through the activities of a variety of actors linking the inside with the outside of this place. A diversity of practices concerning its borders has also been produced by such activities.
View full abstract