The purposes of this paper were to clarify the backgrounds of internal structure models of US cities proposed around the World War II period, i.e., Hommer Hoyt’s sector model and Chauncy Harris and Edward Ullman’s multiple nuclei model, and to examine the changes occurring after the war in this research area. The author not only analyzed papers and books on Hoyt, Harris, and Ullman, but also followed their careers because they engaged in nonacademic work such as business and wartime service during the era of the Great Depression and World War II.
Hoyt joined the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) soon after acquiring his Ph.D. in 1934 with a doctoral dissertation titled “One hundred years of land values in Chicago.” One of the most important tasks of the FHA was to establish a highly stable mortgage system. For this purpose, Hoyt and his colleagues, as FHA researchers, analyzed huge amounts of data collected from several land-use surveys conducted by the Works Progress Administration. Using those research results, Hoyt crystallized his sector model.
Both Harris and Ullman followed the typical careers of academic geographers, but they also served in the military during World War II. Harold Mayer, a good friend from their graduate student years and another famous Chicago urban geographer, also seemed to have made critical contributions to their paper titled “The nature of cities,” describing their multiple nuclei model. Mayer served as a research planner for the Chicago Planning Commission under the directorship of Hoyt. During this period, Mayer gained considerable knowledge and learned many research skills from Hoyt and other land economists and urban planners.
Next, the author examined Eshref Shevky and Wendy Bell’s social area analysis, the first epochmaking postwar work in this field, to identify what changes the end of the war brought to research in this area. Their research methods were applicable to many US cities for which census tract (CT) statistics were available. CT statistics were produced as early as 1910, but it was only after the 1940 census that the US federal government assumed responsibility for producing CT statistics for major cities. Their study marked an important landmark in clearing various research constraints during World War II.
The findings of this study illustrate the importance of nonacademic practices for research developments in US urban studies around the World War II period. Later, Hoyt and Mayer enthusiastically promoted effective cooperation and codevelopment between the nonadacemic and academic worlds.
View full abstract