In the late 1980s, the European Union (EU) shifted from sectoral (or agricultural) to territorial (or integral) rural policies. The fundamental ideas behind this shift are presented in
The Future of Rural Society (1988), which emphasized a bottom-up, endogenous approach for rural development. These directions were formalized under the
Liaisons Entre Actions Développement de l'Economie Rurale (LEADER) program. Initially, the EU considered this program “a laboratory for rural development, ” with a limited budget. Nevertheless, as this program achieved a certain degree of success, the EU enforced it and made it mainstream (currently, the fourth stage of the program [2007–2013] is being implemented). This paper reviews studies and discussions on bottom-up, endogenous rural development in Europe, focusing on the LEADER program.
Because of the difficulties that an exhaustive survey presents, this paper focuses on three aspects of those studies. First, the relationship between actors involved in the planning and management of this program was examined. Previous studies dealing with this theme found significant effects of their power relations and called for framing strong measures for social inclusion. Second, the ways in which partnerships in this program were formed were investigated, and it was clarified that the formation of effective partnerships requires time and professional animators to support these processes. Third, evaluation methods for this program were analyzed. As the LEADER program progressed, its evaluation methods came to reflect its principles and strategies. Additionally, some scholars insisted on the introduction of participative evaluation along with learning and empowerment through the evaluative processes.
Studies of the LEADER program tackled not only empirical analyses and evaluations but also theoretical explanations. In particular, two theoretical enquiries were conducted. First, the meaning of places/territories in rural development was examined. Ray's (1998) “culture economy” approach illustrated an entire mechanism whereby economic development was exploiting the cultures and identities of places/territories. Second, some authors tried to overcome the dualism of endogenous/exogenous development with network approaches. These empirical and theoretical findings showed that a number of elements in the LEADER program were strongly interrelated. Therefore, Ray (2001, 2006) attempted to provide an integrative rural development theory in the European context, called “neo-endogenous rural development.
These studies provided not only important concepts for inducing bottom-up, endogenous rural development in contemporary Japan but also research strategies for devising more effective or alternative rural development theories based on both the actual situation under the current rural development schemes and on social theories.
View full abstract