It has been passed over 10 years since Omega method was incorporated in to API579⁄ASME FFS-1. Since the Omega method provides realistic remaining lives compared to the traditional LMP method, the application of the Omega method has been increased in the Oil and Petrochemical industry in Japan. Most of the application experiences seems to be remaining life evaluations based on the primary membrane stress delivered by a relatively simple hoop stress equation. This is very important achievement since it optimizes the equipment renewal cost without sacrificing the public safety.
On the other hand, it is notable that the Omega method is possible to evaluate creep strain that is crucial for FEM analysis model development while the LMP method is not. Incorporation of creep strain in FEM analysis would improve the accuracy of FEM model since the stress redistribution and creep relaxation could be accounted. Improvement of accuracy of FEM model will be able to enlighten us a potential local damage so that we could conduct an appropriate preventive inspection and maintenance. However, looking in the Oil and Petrochemical industry in Japan, as far as the Author knows, there are not so many FEM evaluation in creep range using Omega method. Considering the fact that, in the Oil and Petrochemical industry in Japan, most of the higher-margin units are operated in the creep range, so it would be valuable to improve the FEM based creep assessment technology to improve the reliability
From this viewpoint, we tried FEM analysis of the external pressure vessel operated in creep range as the first experience of API 579⁄ASME FFS-1 Part 10 Omega method application for our team, and developed ASME PVP2017-65194. In the following, the detailed evaluation procedure, the inspection findings and the comparison between inspection findings and FEM analysis of our ASME PVP 2017 65194 paper are reviewed for Japanese stakeholders to enhance the application of API 579⁄ASME FFS-1 technology in Japan.
View full abstract