This paper investigated the saving effect on direct energy input (consumed fuel) from a serial experiments of no-tillage farming (NT) and a conventional tillage farming (CT) for seven years.
1) The NT saved direct energy input per unit area (Ea) of 49% in dent corn, 69% in feed turnip and 61% in barley and wheat in comparison with the CT because of omitting both plowing and harrowing.
2) The order of Ea in the CT were harvesting>plowing>disk harrowing in dent corn, plowing>loading and carrying>disk harrowing in feed turnip, plowing>harvesting>disk harrowing in barley and wheat, so both plowing and harvesting required a lot of energy in the all operations.
3) Disk harrowing required the most energy per unit time (Et) in the all operations.
4) If the estimation of Ea and Et allows the error within 10% in seeding and fertilizing, energy calculation can used the same values of Ea and Et for both CT and NT.
5) We estimated the turning points of profit and loss in energy balance with the everage yield of two crops published in Japan. If the NT attain the only 45% of CT yield in dent corn and the only 33% of CT yield in wheat, the output/input ratio of direct energy in NT was equivalent to that in CT from the result of estimation.
View full abstract