To prevent stone accidents, several modifications have been made to a conventional bush cutter head. One of the modification is to mount a shear bar with counter edges over the conventional blade (counter edge cutting type).
Another modification is to put two notched blades, one over the other, and to reciprocally reverse the blade (relative cutting type).
Tests were conducted in relation to stone scattering, operation efficiency and energy required to cut stems of weed, and result were compared with impact cutting type bush cutter without counter edges.
1) Because the counter edges obstructed stone scattering, the percentage of stones scattered toward the operator by the counter edge cutting type bush cutter was half of that of the impact cutting type.
2) The percentage of stones scattered by the counter edge type decreased with the decrease of the blade rotating speed, and the direction of stone scattering tends to shift on the left-hand side of the operator, making it safer to use the counter edge type.
3) The work efficiency for the impact cutting type rapidly decreased as the rotating speed of blade decreases to 5, 000rpm or less, where that of the counter edge type decreased a little with the slow rotating speed.
4) For the counter edge cutter type, the energy to cut single stems of Golden-rod decreased with the decrease in the blade rotating speed, and with the increase in the blade traveling speed. Impact cutting has been shown to impart energy to the stem due to stem deflection and also to suffer energy loss from stem due to blade friction, Hence, impact cutting type would be expected to require more energy than counter edge type.
5) For cutting of young rice plants, the effect of increasing clearance between the blade and counter edge was small over a range of clearance in practice. The young rice plants shearing abilities of the counter edge and relative cutting type were superior to that of the impact cutting type. More than 90% of rice plants were sheared by relative cutting type even at the low level of peripheral speed, 5-15m/s.
Since these cutter heads has a complicated structure, it is evident that more work using different approaches is necessary.
View full abstract