At first, I defined the professions legitimated by national qualifications and delivered by plural types of education institutions as "multi track professions". We Japanese have many kinds of such professions, for example, nurse, nursery and dietitian, and so on. So many institutions -junior colleges, vocational schools and universities, and so on - join these educational programs that we do not know well about those training programs or roots and whether or not there are differences between them. Thus I picked up Japanese dietitian as one of such professions and compared the curriculums of four junior colleges with three vocational schools in the numbers of compulsory credits, referring to the counterparts of national curriculums. As a result, I concluded that the diversity in the numbers of the compulsory credits came from the convergence of school graduates' courses, rather than it depended on the type of schools itself. As a whole, vocational schools tended to have more credits and practices than junior colleges. But it was not true to all cases. Some junior colleges set more credits. Then I examined the causes, and those junior colleges graduates tended to be more dietitians than other junior colleges. We tend to analyze these "multi track professions" from the point of the school type without considering the meaning of itself. But this analysis suggests that we should seek the meaning. It can be said that Japanese government assures homogeneity of "multi track professions" by law. In other words, concerned law ensures that every "multi track profession" is equal regardless of the school type because they are based on the same curriculums. We have undervalued this point but should examine the behind meanings of the diversity.
View full abstract