This paper reviews the current skills and learning policy formulated by the UK Labour government toward improving the skill levels of UK's adult population. Recent government reforms have aimed at building a 'demand-led' system that can respond to the demands of employers and individuals. This paper examines the role of the Learning and Skills Councils, and analyses the impact and issues of the demand-led funding programs in the UK, such as the government-led adult basic learning program 'Skills for Life' launched in 2001. Targeted at individuals who face social and educational risk, the funding programs have aimed to create learning demands, and budget distribution was preponderantly directed toward broadening access to learning and training. Recent research findings show that the funding programs aimed at delivering basic skills to the target population have an effect on learning providers and individuals and are moderately successful in increasing learners' participation. However, this paper argues that this system is too consumer-oriented and market-led, and the funding, which is largely short term, focuses on quantitative outcomes of qualifications and achievements. In this respect, the demand-led approach does not necessarily imply stability. In conclusion, the analysis shows that the demand-led approach has led to administrative centralising and standardisation of the framework of delivering skills. Further discussion is necessary on how the public management system should be improved in order to address the multi-layered issues in national upskilling.
View full abstract