Several studies ever conducted on the pressure losses of a venturi scrubber were scarcely subjected to theoretical analysis and the results were merely expressed by the following empirical equation.
(1)
In order to give some theoretical considerations to the above equation, we studied, in the first place, only the pressure drop through the venturi pipes as shown in Fig. 2, where no liquid was injected.
The starting point for our calculation of pressure and velocity was located on the venturi axis in Section 3, where the difference of statical pressure between the center and the wall side was found to be minimum as illustrated in Fig. 4. Then the pressure dropes in Sections 1 and 4 were calculated. Theoretical pressures without any losses were obtained for Section 1 and 4 by means of E
qs. (5) and (15), respectively, paying due attention to isothermal change in compressible fluid. Next. the pressure losses were evaluated by dividing them into three parts, -the pressure loss in the convergent part of the venturi tube, in the throat part and in the divergent part thereof-and by incorporating them in the end.
In the convergent part, the pressure change (Δ
p1-2) was found to be the sum of (i) the pressure drop due to velocity increase and (ii) the loss of friction, as indicated by E
q. (13). In the throat part, the pressure drop (Δ
p2-3) was caused only by the friction loss, as expressed by E
q. (14). From the above considcration, the difference in pressure between Section 1 and 3, that is Δ
p1-3, which was calculated from Δ
p1-3=Δ
p1-2+Δ
p2-3l, may be regarded as the best representation of the experimental values, as shown in Fig. 5. In the divergent part, the pressure change (Δ
p3-4) was obtained from E
q. (16), but it is apparent from Fig. 5 that the values ( ) calculated by means of E
q. (16) did not show very good agreement with the experimental values ( ), when the throat velocity was higher. These values were obtained from E
q. (16) into which was introduced Gibson's empirical E
q. (17) in the place of Δ
p3-4l, which indicates the loss due to the increase in the cross section.
On the other hand, good agreement is observed between the calculated values (dotted line) and experimental data ( ) as shown in Fig. 5, when Δ
p3-4 was calculated by using E
q. (18) in which ζ was evaluated by means of E
q. (20) whose β is illustrated in Fig. 6 and Eq. (21) as a function of
The typical example of the total pressure drop through the venturi tube calculaed by E
q. (23), which was obtained by adding E
qs. (12), (14) and (18), is given by a solid line in Fig. 7, where the corresponding experimental data are marked by . When ρ
1≅ρ
3≅ρ
4 and m
2 is neglected, Eq. (23) is transformed into Eq. (24). Values for the aforesaid example obtained from this epuation are marked by a series of in Fig. 7.
Thus we may conclude that the value, equivalent to
b in E
q. (1), can be given as follows, though merely for a practical purpose: and that
b may be considered a function of the shape of a venturi tube and also a function of the properties of fruid passing through the throat.
View full abstract