In this paper, peer-response is regarded as an activity for revising essays, in which feedback is given from the reader's perspective. The research question is to see how peer-response influences the self-revision of intermediate students.
Using the average scores for the revised essays as an indicator, I compared the peer-response group with the teacher feedback group in terms of the totals for the six assignments and the increase observed between the first and the sixth scores (students revised on their own for the first and sixth assignments).
The results suggest that peer-response worked on the contents of the essays, while teacher feedback worked on forms of the Japanese expressions used in the essays. In the self-revised assignments, peer-response had an effective influence on the contents without a negative effect on forms; on the other hand teacher feedback showed less effect on forms. This means the influence of peer-response is more effective in the self-revision and suggests that it is hard for teacher feedback to be internalized.
View full abstract