The Sugarcane Ordinary commodity policy started in the Nansei islands in 2007. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the requirement to receive the subsidy of the new sugarcane policy and the characteristic response of the farmers. This paper also presents a case study of an effective response to the new policy.
The Nansei islands are classified in 3 groups according to response to the new policy. The first group of islands are large scale and have a very small effect on the policy. The second group, in which many islands included, are middle scale, but management scale and organization is not related to the requirement to receive the subsidy. The third group is small scale and cannot respond to the new policy.
However, the ratio of farmers who meet the requirement for the main stipulation in the new policy is determined by the progress of the use of harvest machines. Hence the ratio of machine use by small-hold farmer has a great influence on the ratio of machine use of the island.
Therefore, among the second group, the study examines the case of Amami-oshima, because the ratio of machine use by small-hold farmers is at a high level with machine utilization being rapidly advanced recently in this island. As a result, it is clarified that the approach of the trustee farmer and the formal organization stimulates the usage of harvest machine demand, and that the formal trustee organization supplements the disadvantaged area.
View full abstract