Objective: To demonstrate specific examples and the assignment of ethics review systems for nursing research in hospital where clinical nursing research is implemented, and to study the future direction of ethical review systems.
Methods: An inquiring survey of the persons in charge of research on ethics reviews, or who are versed in ethics reviews, was conducted by convenience sampling, selecting one cooperating hospital from each type of organization (national/public universities, corporation, university-affiliated school, technical school, etc.).
Results: The analysis of the data from the six hospitals showed problems such as: 1) the review systems depend on the hospital, some hospitals review every nursing research result with the research ethics board, some review the research in the nursing department separately from the ethics board, and there are hospitals without a review system, 2) they also have differences in the establishment and the contents of the review criteria, 3) some institutions do not have a nursing or ethics specialist on the research ethics board, 4) the standards of ordinary or basic reviews are undefined, the reviews are time-consuming, or the knowledge of research ethics are deficient.
Discussion: There is an urgent need to work on the cultivation of human resources to properly conduct nursing research ethics reviews, and academic societies and nursing associations are required to present educational/training programs, and to offer the information on the research ethics.
View full abstract