The numerous variances of percolation in paddy fields are reported in this paper, and studies on these were made to approach an effective method that would reduce the percolation through paddy fields of volcanic ash soil.
These studies have distinctly revealed an extream inequality of percolation intensity within the paddy field of volcanic ash soil. This indicates that the functions of the reclamation methods commonly practiced are only limited to transformation of surface, totally leaving the treatment of sub-soil intact. Therefore, this means only a work of outward reformation.
On the other hand, dressing of bentonite can not be expected to effectively reduce the percolation unless the work was done as a step in a reclamation that includes a treatment of sub-soil.
In reclaiming paddy fields of volcanic ash soil emphasis must be made on the treatment of subsoil that has an excessive rate of percolation. A lack of due consideration to this point. would make bentonite dressing ineffective as a means of reducing percolation.
Following are the major points made clear in this report :
1) The results of mixing bentonite (less than 0.7 t/10a, -200 mesh) with the surface soil after paddy field reclamation showed that the percolation in the initial year was far over the criterion value of 3.0-4.0 cm/day. The percolation rate after the bentonite mixing was 9.8-50.4 cm/day in Oideno field on the foot of Mt. Iwate.
2) The bentonite treatment is effective to some degree in reducing percolation in paddy fields. But the high permeability of sub-soil exceeds the bentonite effect. Therefore, the priority must be given to elimination of the effect of the high permeability.
3) The value o percolation intensity within one paddy division are quite inuniform with a wide range. They form L-type frequency curves. In other words, in one paddy division a few portions with excessive rate of percolation raises the mean value of the division. Therefore, the amount of irrigation water may be saved considerably if the percolation intensity were equalized at the mode intensity. Based on actual measurements in new paddy fields, it was calculated that
M0/
M≅0.05-0.30, S/M≅1.0-3.0. Here
M means the mean value,
M0 means the mode value and S means the standard deviation of percolation intensities. From these it can be said that a uniformity of percolation should be achieved in reclaiming paddy fields.
4) In paddy fields of volcanic ash soil a considerable inequalty remains even in 60-year-old field. In this case the paddy had been reclaimed by a common method that lacked a treatment on sub-soil. Therefore, it can be said that farming only is inadequate to erase this inequality. In the old field surveyed,
M0/
M≅0.4-1.0, and
S/
M≅0.25-1.0.
5) The characteristics of percolation inequality in one division was as follows : The high percolation rate was seen in the cut sub-soil part, and less percolation was seen in banked sub-soil. Also, the percolation rate in the foot area of ridge was bigger than that in the central part. However, percolation in the ridge foot is affected by sub-sA too, and the percolation rate in the ridge mounted on cut sub-soil was bigger than that in the banking part.
6) Although the inequality of percolation was seen bath in cut and banking parts, the percolation was more uniform in the banking part than in cut part.
The results stated above suggest that an effective way to unify and reduce the percolation within one division is to spread the banked and rolled horizon of sub-soil to the entire area of the division. This point is a guide to our future researches, and we plan to do minute studies in the issues following this.
抄録全体を表示