The differences between MoS
2, CoMoS and NiMoS HDS catalysts supported on γ-alumina and high SSA titania are investigated based on the results of [
35S]DBT HDS experiments. Previous studies of MoS
2 and CoMoS are reviewed, discussed and compared with new results for NiMoS. Introduction of Ni or Co to MoS
2/Al
2O
3 catalysts classically yields a significant increase in HDS performance. Irrespective of the promoter, an increase in
S0, the number of labile sulfur atoms, is observed. In contrast,
kRE, the H
2S liberation rate constant, plotted as a function of the Ni/Mo ratio, presents a volcano profile on Ni-promoted catalysts, but
kRE reaches a plateau from low Co/Mo ratios on Co-promoted catalysts. The 'TiMoS' phase, which is formed
in-situ during HDS on Mo/TiO
2 catalysts, promotes sulfur mobility and makes Mo/TiO
2 catalysts more active than Mo/Al
2O
3 catalysts. Nevertheless, CoMo/TiO
2 catalysts are less active than CoMo/Al
2O
3 catalysts because further promotion of 'TiMoS' phase with Co might yield excessive weakening of the metal-sulfur bonds, and/or some Co atoms might be 'lost' in the TiO
2 matrix without interacting with MoS
2. In contrast, introduction of Ni to Mo/TiO
2 catalysts yields significant increases in both
kRE and
S0. The NiMo/TiO
2 catalysts exhibit HDS performances close to those of Al
2O
3-supported catalysts. Clearly catalytic behavior over Co- and Ni-promoted catalysts is different.
View full abstract