The Journal of Japanese Botany
Online ISSN : 2436-6730
Print ISSN : 0022-2062
ISSN-L : 0022-2062
Current issue
Displaying 1-12 of 12 articles from this issue
Invited paper for J. Jap. Bot. Memorial Volume 100
  • Masayuki Fukuoka, Hidekazu Suzuki, Mitsunobu Kamiya, Jiro Tanaka
    Article type: Invited paper for Memorial Volume 100
    2026Volume 101Issue 3 Pages 133-144
    Published: June 20, 2026
    Released on J-STAGE: June 20, 2026
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
    Supplementary material

    A taxonomic study was conducted on a marine benthic cyanobacterium, collected from Shizuoka and Wakayama Prefectures, and it was identified as Cyanoplacoma micrococca based on detailed morphological observations and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Until now, no molecular data had been available for C. micrococca, and morphological descriptions were also limited. The specimens of this species based on their yellowish-brown, sac-like thalli; outer layer cells enveloped by a yellowish-brown sheath; inner layer cells smaller than outer layer; and occurrence on rocks in the supralittoral zone. Molecular phylogenetic analyses placed this species clustering (Cyanoplacoma clade) with the related taxa C. adriatica. All members of the Cyanoplacoma clade share pseudoparenchymatous colonies composed of rows of cells. The present findings therefore provide the first molecular characterization of this species and offer new insights into the taxonomy of the genus Cyanoplacoma.

Originals
  • Kumiko Kijima, Masami Sakai, Kei Amada
    Article type: Originals
    2026Volume 101Issue 3 Pages 145-149
    Published: June 20, 2026
    Released on J-STAGE: June 20, 2026
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

    The genus Tabularia currently comprises 20 accepted diatom species, among which T. sinensis was first described from Poyang Lake, China. In this study, we re-examined Japanese specimens of T. sinensis using scanning electron microscopy, focusing on the structure of the valvocopula. In our previous report, we described the valvocopula of T. sinensis as open at one end. However, the present observations confirmed that it is closed at both ends. This feature has not been reported in other Tabularia species and is considered characteristic of the genus Ulnaria. The previously observed open-ended structures were likely artifacts caused by sample preparation damage. Recent molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that some species currently placed in Tabularia may require taxonomic reassessment. Morphologically, T. sinensis exhibits intermediate features between Tabularia and Ulnaria, suggesting a complex taxonomic position. (Continued from J. Jap. Bot. 95: 291–296, 2020)

  • Norio Kikuchi, Shota Suzuki, Motoya Tamaki, Takuzo Abe
    Article type: Originals
    2026Volume 101Issue 3 Pages 150-161
    Published: June 20, 2026
    Released on J-STAGE: June 20, 2026
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

    Many Japanese bladed species in Bangiales (Rhodophyta), that were originally classified in the genus Porphyra C.Agardh, have been transferred to other genera based on molecular phylogenetic analyses. The generic placement of six species, currently placed in Porphyra, has not been confirmed with sequence data. One of these, Porphyra akasakae A.Miura is distributed along the Sanriku coast, northern Honshu, Japan. Morphological observations and molecular phylogenetic analysis based on the nrSSU and rbcL genes of this species resolved it was an independent species within the genus Pyropia J.Agardh. Therefore, we propose a new combination: Pyropia akasakae (A.Miura) N.Kikuchi, Shot.Suzuki, Tamaki & Ta.Abe.

  • Yuya Hayase
    Article type: Originals
    2026Volume 101Issue 3 Pages 162-175
    Published: June 20, 2026
    Released on J-STAGE: June 20, 2026
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

    Literature by C. J. Maximowicz: ‘Diagnoses (breves) plantarum novarum Japoniae et Mandshuriae I–XX’ and ‘Diagnoses plantarum novarum asiaticarum I–VII’ were published in ‘Bulletin de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg’ and reprinted in ‘Mélanges Biologiques Tirés du Bulletin Physico-Mathématique du Bulletin de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg’. However, on reexamining these publication dates, I found that the reprinted versions of ‘Diagn. Pl. Nov. Jap. et Mands. XVI’ and ‘Diagn. Pl. Nov. Asiat. IV’ were published a month earlier than the original versions, at the end of the previous year. The scientific names in these sources were validly published in the reprinted version, with the publication year being one year earlier. Additionally, ‘Diagn. Pl. Nov. Asiat. VIII’ was not published in either of these two journals but published separately. Furthermore, the dates attached to the titles of his papers, which might be the date of (oral) presentation, have often been mistaken for the date of publication. It should also be noted that many of the publication dates are written in the Julian calendar. The factors mentioned above should be considered when quoting Maximowicz’s scientific names and their valid publications.

Notes
Book review
feedback
Top