The ratio of female dentists in Japan is 14.8%, and the ratio of female members of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry's members is 37.8%. In a word, the ratio of woman is higher than the entire ratio of female dentists in pediatric dentistry. However, there had been little research concer ning the number of female dentists in pediatric dentistry.
To investigate how the female dentist influenced the child patient, child patient's eye movement was measured, and then the result was analyzed and examined.
Subiects were 37 child patients who came to the clinic of pediatric dentistry of Nippon dental university, school of dentistry at Niigata.
First of all, we made a test picture. The test picture assumed that the female dentist, subject's mother, and the dental hygienist entered the view of the subject in the lying on his back during dental treatment and we took a picture. We made the test picture for the video picture adding the voice by which the subject was talked to, the female dentist saying “Open your mouth”, subject's mother “Be good” and the dental hygienist “You did it”.
The test picture was presented to the subject as audio-visual stimulus, and subject's eye movement was measured with a visicon eye camera'.
The subjects were divided into the non-scanning group which did not see the person who was talking as did the scanning group which saw the person who was talking when three people were talking respectively, and the change in the eye movement by talking was analyzed based on the fixation point immediately before talking. Changes in the eye movement when the patient was being talked to were analyzed based on the fixation point immediately before being talked to. As a result, the following conclusions were obtained.
1. As regards the fixation point immediately before being talked to,24 subjects (64.9%) riveted their eye on the dentist and 13 subjects (35.1%) did not; 10 subjects (27.0%) riveted on the mother and 27subjects (73.0%) did not; 9 subjects (24.3%) riveted on the dental hygienist and 28 subjects (75.7%)did not.
2. Regarding the scanning group,28 subjects (75.7%) belonged to the dentist scanning group and 9subjects (24.3%) belonged to non-scanning group; 23 subjects (62.2%) belonged to the motherscanning group and 14 subjects (37.8%) belonged to the non-scanning group; 21 subjects (56.8%)belonged to the hygienist-scanning group and 16 subjects (43.2%) belonged non-scanning group.
3. Each scanning group increased in accordance with dentists, mothers and dental hygienist's talking, and a significant difference was recognized especially with the mother and the dental hygienist.
It has therefore been found that the child patient sees the person doing the talking, did the talking and child patient's eye movement to the female dentist in particular was not recognized.
View full abstract