The Japanese government and communities have designed and tried many programs to develop and propagate dietary education ; of these, school-lunch programs are thought to be one of the most useful tools. The first aim of the present observational study was to clarify the different effects of Japanese staple foods such as noodles, boiled rice, and breads on masticatory parameters with regard to school-lunch intake. The next aim was to discuss the school-lunch menus, with reference to the above observational results and the replies submitted to a questionnaire by the general public.In the observational study, the subjects included six elementary school children aged 11 to 12years, who were recorded on videotape eating the six kinds of school-lunches. The school-lunches consisted of three kinds of staple foods with two different side menus. The masticatory parameters were calculated based on the recorded videotapes, and the differences among the school-lunches were statistically analyzed. The questionnaire survey roughly consisted of four categories on the schoollunch, and 170 adult cooperators submitted their replies.The observational study revealed that the staple foods included in the school-lunches had little effect on the masticatory parameters. According to the results of the questionnaire, more than 80% ofthe general public would like to have rice included in the menus three to five times per week, and approximately 65% expected the other menus two to four times per month.Since four of the present menus consisted of noodles and breads which presented a poor balance of nutrients, it was therefore indicated that the school-lunches should be primarily composed of boiled rice. More than half of the general public, however, sometimes hopes for menus other than the rice menus. From a masticatory perspective, there were few differences among the six menus. It may therefore be taken into consideration that menus with noodles or breads should be served a few times a month for school-lunches.
View full abstract