Several kinds of surgical approaches are proposed for the direct operation of a VA-PICA aneurysm, because it has a unique anatomical relationship, especially to the brainstem and the lower cranial nerves. But the surgical positioning for its operation has hardly been discussed. This paper describes the influences of the surgical positioning on the approach and the exposure of this aneurysm.
As the sitting position has a risk of air embolism, we have not used it as a routine. We have operated on 8 cases in the supine lateral position, 3 cases in the modified semilateral position and 4 cases in the modified semiprone position.
In the supine lateral position, the patient is first anesthetized in the supine position, the operating table on the cephalad is elevated ca. 20 degrees to reduce the intracranial venous pressure, the patient's shoulder on the operated side is elevated ca. 20 degrees, and his head is rotated toward the healthy side to a complete lateral position. His neck is flexed anteriorly and his vertex is pushed downwards to provide more space between the foramen magnum and the atlas.
In the modified semilateral position, the patient is first placed in the lateral position with his contralateral arm extended out from the table and lifted up from it. The patient's shoulder on the operated side, is let down ca. 50 degrees, his head is kept lateral. The slope of the operating table (head up), neck flexion and vertex down are undertaken in the same way as in the supine lateral position. As described, the contralateral arm is lifted with a splint-fixation.
In the modified semiprone position, the patient is anesthetized first on the other table, then turned round and moved to the operating table in the prone position. the patient's shoulder on the operated side is elevated ca. 40 degrees, his head is rotated toward the operated side to the lateral position. Other points are same as in the modified semilateral position. The only difference is that his contralateral arm is placed and fixed on his back.
The supine lateral position has a merit of not raising the intrathoracic pressure. But it does easily compress the jugular vein, resulting a rise of intacranial venous pressure, which may cause intraoperative venous bleeding and postoperative facial edema. In addition, this position has another major demerit. As the head is turned toward the non-operated side, the nuchal muscles become tense, interfering with sufficient opening of the operative field and adequate craniectomy to the lateral, making the far lateral approach difficult.
The modified semilateral or semiprone position has a tendency to raise the intrathoracic pressure, but it is within the range of easy control. The primary advantage of these positions is that the head is turned toward the operative side, which relaxes the nuchal muscles. We can therefore open the operative field sufficiently and extend the craniectomy laterally to enable the far lateral approach. We have an impression that, for the patients with short and thick neck, the modified semiprone position with the contralateral patient's arm placed and fixed on his back is better than the modified semilateral position with his contralateral arm lifted from the table.
抄録全体を表示