Background: Musculoskeletal neck pain is the fourth common cause of disability worldwide. Scapula dysfunction can subsequently lead to neck pain. Previous literature could not establish the effectiveness of scapular stabilization exercises on neck pain due to the different definitions used for exercise in different studies. There is a need for quality evidence examining the effectiveness of scapular interventions on pain and disability in patients with neck pain.

Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, OVID, and PEDro were searched from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2022.

Methods: We included randomized controlled trials that focused on scapular interventions and other active strategies in the management of neck pain. The following outcomes were assessed: pain, disability, and quality of life. PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias and the data pooled was analyzed using standardized mean difference.

Results: The 5 trials included in the review assessed (116 participants) the effects of scapular interventions in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Risk of bias for one study was low and that for the others was moderate. The meta-analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the combined effect of neck and scapula interventions and only neck interventions group (Standardized mean difference −1.51, 95% CI [−2.79, −0.23], z=2.32, p=0.02). On assessing the effect of scapula interventions on disability, the results revealed that there was no significant (p=0.40) impact.

Conclusion: Moderate quality evidence was found for the combined effect of scapular and neck interventions in reducing pain in patients with neck pain. However, it was not effective in improving the disability.

Background: The emergence of novel minimally invasive techniques has opened new horizons for the management of degenerative diseases of the spine. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained considerable attention through its applications in various pathologies. In the present review, an overview of the science behind the application of PRP is provided, ultimately focusing on the clinical trials that may render it a useful tool in the hands of spine surgeons in the future.

Methods: A review of the available literature is conducted, focusing on its existing clinical and experimental applications with a particular interest in the degenerative diseases of the spine.

Results: In terms of the degenerative diseases of the spine, initial studies suggest that it is a safe and effective method that could change the practice of spinal cord medicine in the years to come. The available studies demonstrate that besides being minimally invasive, causing less discomfort than that of surgery, it provides longer lasting improvement than standard pharmaceutical interventions.

Conclusions: PRP is an emerging and promising biodrug for the treatment of patients with spinal pain. PRP has demonstrated some promising qualities; however, careful consideration of its indications of use and strict protocols of application need to be established before widespread clinical induction.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating injury that causes permanent neurological dysfunction. To develop a new treatment strategy for SCI, a clinical trial of transplantation of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural precursor cells (NPCs) in patients in the subacute phase of SCI was recently initiated. The formation of synaptic connections with host neural tissues is one of the therapeutic mechanisms of cell transplantation, and this beneficial efficacy has been directly demonstrated using a chemogenetic tool. This research focuses on the establishment of cell therapy for chronic SCI, which is more challenging owing to cavity and scar formation. Thus, neurogenic NPC transplantation is more effective in forming functional synapses with the host neurons. Furthermore, combinatory rehabilitation therapy is useful to enhance the efficacy of this strategy, and a valid rehabilitative training program has been established for SCI animal models that received NPC transplantation in the chronic phase. Therefore, the use of regenerative medicine for chronic SCI is expected to increase.

Introduction: While there is anecdotal evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic altered perioperative decision-making in patients requiring posterior cervical fusion (PCF), a national-level analysis to examine the significance of this hypothesis has not yet been conducted. This study aimed to determine the potential differences in perioperative variables and surgical outcomes of PCF performed before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Adults who underwent PCF were identified in the 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 (intrapandemic) NSQIP datasets. Differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. On the other hand, differences in operative time and relative value units (RVUs) were estimated using quantile regression. Furthermore, the odds ratios (OR) for length of stay (LOS) were estimated using negative binomial regression. Secondary outcomes included rates of nonhome discharge and outpatient surgery.

Results: A total of 3,444 patients were included in this study (50.7% from 2020). Readmission, reoperation, morbidity, operative time, and RVUs per minute were similar between cohorts (p>0.05). The LOS (OR 1.086, p<0.001) and RVUs-per-case (coefficient +0.360, p=0.037) were significantly greater in 2020 compared to 2019. Operation year 2020 was also associated with lower rates of nonhome discharge (22.3% vs. 25.8%, p=0.017) and higher rates of outpatient surgery (4.8% vs. 3.0%, p=0.006).

Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a 28% decreased odds of nonhome discharge following PCF and a 72% increased odds of PCF being performed in an outpatient setting were observed. The readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates remained unchanged during this period. This is notable given that patients in the 2020 group were more frail. This suggests that patients were shifted to outpatient centers possibly to make up for potentially reduced case volume, highlighting the potential to evaluate rehabilitation-discharge criteria. Further research should evaluate these findings in more detail and on a regional basis.

Introduction: Patients affected by autoimmune pathologies such as rheumatoid arthritis require surgery for various reasons. However, the systemic inflammatory nature of these disease processes often necessitates therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Alteration of these agents in the perioperative period for surgery requires a careful risk-benefit analysis to limit disease flares, infection rates, and secondary revisions. We therefore queried North and South American practices for perioperative management of DMARDs in patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

Methods: An institutional review board-approved pilot survey was disseminated to spine surgeons regarding how they managed DMARDs before, during, and after spine surgery.

Results: A total of 47 spine surgeons responded to the survey, 37 of whom were neurosurgeons (78.7%) and 10 orthopedic surgeons (21.3%). Of the respondents, 80.9% were from North America, 72.3% were board-certified, 51.1% practiced in academic institutions, and 66.0% performed 50-150 spine surgeries per year. Most respondents consulted a rheumatologist before continuing or withholding a DMARD in the perioperative period (70.2%). As such, a majority of the spine surgeons in this survey withheld DMARDs at an average of 13.8 days before and 19.6 days after spine surgery. Of the spine surgeons who withheld DMARDs before and after spine surgery, the responses were variable with a trend toward no increased risk of postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Based on the results of this pilot survey, we found a consensus among spine surgeons to withhold DMARDs before and after elective spine surgery.

Introduction: Leaving against medical advice (AMA) has been associated with higher rates of readmission and worse postoperative outcomes in various surgical fields. Patients who have undergone spine surgery often require careful postoperative follow-up to ensure an uncomplicated recovery. In this study, we aim to investigate the demographic and hospital variables that may have contributed to patients leaving the hospital AMA following spine surgery.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients receiving spine surgery; we used the data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database for the years 2011-2020. Demographics, household income status, insurance status, time from admission to operation, length of stay, length of recovery, and discharge disposition were collected and analyzed. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine the odds ratios of each factor and their association to patient decision of leaving AMA.

Results: As per our findings, patients aged 30-49 had 1.666 times greater odds of leaving AMA following spine surgery (P<0.001), patients aged 50-64 had 1.222 times greater odds of leaving AMA (P=0.001), and patients older than 65 had 0.490 times lesser odds of leaving AMA (P<0.001). Additionally, black patients were 1.612 times more likely to leave AMA (P<0.001), whereas white patients were 0.675 times less likely to do so (<0.001). Women were 0.555 times less likely to leave AMA than the rest of the population (P<0.001). Moreover, patients with private insurance were 0.268 times less likely to leave AMA (P<0.001), while patients on Medicare and Medicaid were 1.692 times (P<0.001) and 3.958 times more likely to leave AMA (P<0.001) following spine surgery, respectively. Finally, patients in the lowest quartile of income were 1.691 times more likely to leave AMA (P<0.001), while patients in the higher quartile of income were 0.521 times less likely to do so (P<0.001).

Conclusions: It is critical that spine surgeons are aware of the factors that predispose patients to leave AMA in order to mitigate postoperative complications.

Introduction: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a common treatment for nerve root disease associated with lumbar foraminal stenosis or lumbar spondylolisthesis. At our institution, PLIF is usually performed with high-angle cages and posterior column osteotomy (PLIF with HAP). However, not all patients achieve sufficient segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL). This study determined whether the location of PLIF cages affect local lumbar lordosis formation.

Methods: A total of 59 patients who underwent L4/5 PLIF with HAP at our hospital, using the same titanium control cage model, were enrolled in this cohort study. The mean ratio of the distance from the posterior edge of the cage to the posterior wall of the vertebral body/vertebral length (RDCV) immediately after surgery was 16.5%. The patients were divided into two groups according to RDCV <16.5% (group P) and ≥16.5% (group G). The preoperative and 6-month postoperative slip rate (%slip), SLL, local disk angle (LDA), ratio of disk height/vertebral height (RDV), 6-month postoperative RDCV, ratio of cage length/vertebral length (RCVL), and ratio of posterior disk height/anterior disk height at the fixed level (RPA) were evaluated via simple lumbar spine X-ray. The preoperative and 6-month postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and low back pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores were also evaluated.

Results: Groups G and P included 31 and 28 patients, respectively. The preoperative %slip, SLL, LDA, RDV, JOA score, and low back pain VAS score were not significantly different between the groups. In groups G and P, 6-month postoperative %slip, SLL, LDA, RDV, RDCV, RCVL, and RPA were 3.3% and 7.9%, 18.6° and 15.4°, 9.7° and 8.0°, 36.6% and 40.3%, 21.1% and 10.1%, 71.4% and 77.0%, and 56.1% and 67.7%, respectively. The 6-month postoperative SLL, LDA, RDV, RDCV, RCVL, and RPA significantly differed (p=0.03, 0.02, 0.02, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: Anterior PLIF cage placement relative to the vertebral body is necessary for good SLL in PLIF.

Introduction: The smiley face rod method is an effective treatment for symptomatic terminal-stage spondylolysis. However, the risk factors for treatment failure are unknown. We investigated the association of pars defect type with the treatment outcomes of this method.

Methods: We retrospectively examined data from 34 patients (18.0±6.7 years) with terminal-stage spondylolysis who underwent surgery using the smiley face rod method. The mean follow-up period was 44.9±21.4 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups: pars defect without bone atrophy or sclerosis (group A; 18 patients), and with bone atrophy and sclerosis (group B; 16 patients). We evaluated and compared the visual analog scale (VAS) score for back pain, bone union rate, and time to return to preinjury athletics level between the groups. Fisher exact and paired t tests were used to compare the variables between groups. The VAS score between the groups was compared using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Results: Within groups, the VAS score was significantly different over time (p<0.001). The VAS scores between groups were not significantly different. Patients in group A had a significantly higher bone union rate per pars at 6 months (group A, 65.7%; and group B, 37.5%, p=0.028) and 24 months after surgery (group A, 97.1%; and group B, 75.0%, p=0.011). All patients returned to their respective sports, and no significant differences were observed in the time to return to preinjury athletics level between the groups (p=0.055).

Conclusions: The type of pars defect are associated with bone union after the smiley face rod method, but have little effect on postoperative symptoms.

Introduction: Spinal fusion is an operation that is employed to treat spinal diseases. Surgical site infection (SSI) after lumbar fusion (LF) is a postoperative complication. SSI is treated with irrigation and debridement (I&D), which requires readmittance following discharge or prolonged hospital stays, which are deleterious to patients' mental health. The long-term relationship between treating SSI with I&D and patients' mental health is still understudied.

Methods: Using the Mariner dataset from the PearlDiver Patient Records Database using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases procedure codes, retrospective cohort analysis was carried out. This study involved 445,480 patients who underwent LF with at least 2-year follow-up and were followed up for 2 years. Of the patients, 2,762 underwent I&D. Using univariate analysis employing Pearson Chi-square and Student t-test, where appropriate (Table 1), patient demographics between cohorts were gathered. 2-year cumulative incidence (CI) between LF and I&D cohorts was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure 1～3). Cox proportional hazards were employed to observe significant differences in CI rates (Table 2).

Results: For patients who received I&D, 2-year CI depression (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.49-1.99; P<0.001) and stress (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.02-1.79; P=0.035) rates were significantly higher than for those who did not. There was no statistically significant difference in 2-year CI anxiety rates between cohorts (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.58-1.46; P=0.719).

Conclusions: In conclusion, 16.8% of patients developed new-onset depression 2 years following I&D, in comparison to 10.3% of those who underwent LF. Patients who underwent I&D following LF were significantly more likely to experience depression and stress. To mitigate negative mental health outcomes, mental health services should be available to patients who underwent surgery.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the 10-year clinical outcomes of endoscope-assisted, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and to compare the radiographic changes in patients who underwent this procedure with those who underwent conservative therapy at 10-year follow-up.

Methods: Between April 2007 and April 2010, 347 consecutive patients with DS and evidence of LSS underwent conservative treatment first from 2 to 4 weeks. The 114 patients who failed conservative treatment were then treated surgically by endoscope-assisted MIS decompression. Of them, 91 patients were followed for more than 10 years (group S), and 146 of the 233 patients treated conservatively were followed for more than 10 years (group C). Clinical outcomes of endoscope-assisted MIS decompression were assessed using the Short Form Health Survey-36 score (SF-36), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and the neurological leg symptoms of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA score). Radiographic changes of the two groups were assessed by %slip, dynamic %slip, range of motion (ROM), and the height of the disc (DH) on plain radiographs.

Results: Significant improvements in clinical outcomes on the SF-36, RDQ, and neurological leg symptoms of the JOA were observed. Radiographic assessment did not show significant differences in the assessed items between the two groups at baseline and after last treatment. Both groups had significantly decreased ROM and DH.

Conclusions: The 10-year clinical outcomes of endoscope-assisted MIS decompression for DS were generally good. Furthermore, on radiographic comparison, the progress of spondylolisthesis after this procedure was virtually the same as in the natural course of the disease at 10-year follow-up.

Introduction: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are a significant problem among older patients who are undergoing spine surgery. This study examined the influence of incident OVFs on clinical outcomes and spinal alignment 5 years following short-segment fusion (SSF) for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Methods: We studied 88 patients who underwent SSF (≤2-disc level) for lumbar spinal stenosis with instability and were followed up for more than 5 years postoperatively. Those with prior OVFs were excluded. We evaluated incident OVFs with plain whole-spine lateral radiography preoperatively (before) and at 5 years postoperatively (after). Using preoperative lumbar computed tomography, Hounsfield unit (HU) values were evaluated. The patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of incident OVFs. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was utilized to compare the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and spinal parameters were recorded before and after. Multiple linear regression analyses were employed to investigate the association between the incident OVFs and the clinical scores and spinal alignment recorded after.

Results: In the fracture group, the clinical course of low back pain score on the JOABPEQ, physical component summary SF-36 score, and spinal alignment including C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and pelvic tilt were significantly worse. Multiple linear regression revealed a significant correlation between incident OVFs and worse 5-year postoperative spinal alignment, which includes SVA and TK. The optimal threshold for the HU values for predicting the incidence of OVFs within 5 years postoperatively was 83.0 (area under the curve 0.701).

Conclusions: Incident OVFs in patients following SSF were significantly correlated with the 5-year clinical outcomes and spinal alignment. Patients at risk of OVFs, especially those with HU values below 83, must take preventive measures against OVFs, as this could prevent deteriorating midterm postoperative clinical outcomes and spinal alignment.

Level of Evidence: 3

Introduction: There are no reports that have examined the annual trends of the percentage of women who are members of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR) or their roles at annual meetings. Furthermore, the status of gender diversity in the JSSR remains unclear. This study aims to identify gender diversity in the JSSR by quantifying the role of women at annual meetings over the past decade.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review to explore gender role in the JSSR annual meeting by examining the meeting programs for 2013-2022. The gender ratios were surveyed each year for the following: (1) first authors of general application abstracts (oral and poster), (2) meeting guest speakers, (3) meeting moderators, and (4) program editors of the abstracts. We also investigated the availability of gender equality symposiums.

Results: The percentage of women applying (1.1%-2.1%) and those who were invited as participants [guest speaker (0%-0.9%), moderator (0%-5.8%), and program editor (0%-0.6%) ] at the annual JSSR meetings was low, with no significant increase over the past decade. In addition, there has never been a symposium promoting gender equality at the annual JSSR meeting.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a strong and active role for institutional leaders and senior members to support the scholarly activities of women spine surgeons is important for adopting gender diversity in the JSSR academia. The absence of gender equality symposiums and the few invited women participants at the JSSR annual meeting may be due to a lack of gender diversity awareness among conference organizers or unconscious gender bias. Monitoring the role of women in the JSSR annual meetings may solve the gender diversity problem.

Introduction: In this study, we aim to estimate the natural standing sagittal alignment in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), firstly by investigating the normative values of anatomical pelvic parameters based on the anterior pelvic plane (APP) in a healthy population, and to clarify the relationships between the anatomical and positional pelvic parameters in standing position.

Methods: The images of biplanar slot-scanning full-body stereoradiography in 140 healthy Japanese volunteers (mean age, 39.5 years; 59.3% female) were examined. In addition to three-dimensional measurements including pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT), the APP angle (APPA; anterior tilting=positive) was measured as the angle between the APP and the vertical line using the two-dimensional lateral image. Anatomical SS and PT (aSS and aPT) were calculated as the angles of SS and PT in reference to APP.

Results: The mean (range) values of APPA, aSS, and aPT were determined to be 0.7° (−16.8°/15.5°), 36.8° (18.3°/64.9°), and 13.2° (−0.6°/28.7°), respectively. Moreover, SS was found to be significantly correlated with PI and aSS, while PT was significantly correlated with PI, aSS, aPT, and body weight. Also, PT was significantly larger in females than in males. Multiple linear regression analysis deduced the following equations: SS=0.404×aSS+0.203×PI+12.463, PT=−0.391×aSS+0.774×PI+1.950×sex (male=0, female=1) −12.971, wherein aSS had the greatest effect for predicting SS among the included factors and PI had the greatest effect for predicting PT. In addition, no significant differences were noted between PT/PI and aPT/PI.

Conclusions: As per the results of this study, significant correlations were noted among parameters and predicting models for positional parameters (SS and PT) using anatomical parameters (aSS and aPT) in a healthy population. This novel measurement concept based on the APP has been considered to be useful in estimating natural SS and PT in standing position using the anatomical pelvic parameters in patients with ASD.