To evaluate the efficacy, safety and utility of AM-715 for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, a double blind study comparing AM-715 with pipemidic acid (PPA) was carried out. Patients received either 800mg/day of AM-715 or 2, 000mg/day of PPA four times a day for 5 days by oral route, and the following results were obtained.
1. Of the 339 patients, clinical efficacies were evaluated in 265 cases (AM-715 128 cases, PPA 137 cases) excepting 74 cases those excluded or dropped out. Side effect was evaluated in 334 cases (AM-715 165 cases, PPA 169 cases). There was no significant difference in the back-ground characteristics between the two treatment groups.
2. Overall clinical efficacy was excellent in 30.5%, moderate in 40.6%, and the effectiveness rate was 71.1%in the AM-715 group.It was excellent in 21.2%, moderate in 37.2%, and the effectiveness rate was 58.4%in the PPA group.Significantly higher efficacy was obtained in the AM-715 group (P<0.03).
3. Pyuria was cleared in 38.3% of the cases treated with AM-715 and in 28.5%of the cases treated with PPA. The effect of AM-715 on pyuria seemed superior to that of PPA.Bacteriuria was eliminated in 63.3% of the cases treated with AM-715 and in 48.2%of the cases treated with PPA. The effect of AM-715 on bacteriuria was superior to that of PPA with significant difference (P<0.04).
4. With respect to the classification by the type of infection, overall clinical efficacy in the 5 th group (polymicrobial infection with catheter indwelt) was excellent in 22.2%and moderate in 22.2%(the effectiveness rate 44.4%) in the AM-715 group.It was only moderate in 10%(the effectiveness rate 10%) in the PPA group. No significant difference was observed between the effects of AM-715 and PPA in other 5 groups.
5. The clinical efficacy evaluated by the attending physician was excellent in 36.2%, excellent or good in 66.9%in the AM-715 group. It was excellent in 22.1%, excellent or good in 58.6% in the PPA group. Significant difference was observed between the two groups.
6. In evaluation of GNR cases, the overall clinical efficacy was excellent in 29.3%, moderate in 41.4%and poor in 29.3% in the AM-715 group It was excellent in 16.3%, moderate in 39.0% and poor in 44.7% in the PPA group. Significantly higher efficacy was obtained in the AM-715 group.
7. Side effects were observed in 2 cases (1.2%) in the AM-715 group and in 7 cases (4.1%) in the PPA group. No significant difference was observed between the groups. No severe change in laboratory findings was observed.
8. day of PPA, safe and useful for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. It was considered that 800 mg/day of AM-715 might be same or more effective than 2, 000 mg/day of PPA, safe and useful for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.
View full abstract