As mentioned in the first report, during attempts to inoculate M leprae in mice, the acid fast bacillus have been isolated, and have named "Bacillus No 4 ", which might be the contaminated mycobacteria.
At this time, we have observed the in vivo examination of this "Bacillus No 4" after inoculating into mice subcutaneously and intravenously.
The results obtained by means of their gross lesions of organs, the numbers of bacilli in organs, and the recovery culture indicated that this organism have a characteristic feature of Mycobacterium lepraemurium.
However, in recovery culture of "Bacillus No 4", the gross appearance was different from that of the primary isolate of M. lepraemurium. In latter case, colonies were mostly formed by the membraneous growth. In case of "Bacillus No 4" greater part of primary isolates appeared the discrete colonial growth.
As reported first about in vitro examination, we had almost same results just as when M. lepraemurium was used. But, there were few exceptions.
Also, the indirect fluorescent antibody methods by Dr. Abe showed the unsatisfactory result for identifying as M. leprae or as M. lepraemurium.
The character of "Bacillus No 4" is now still under examination, so no final conclusion can be made yet on its taxonomic position. (This work was supported by the grant from the Leprosy Panel of the U. S.-Japan Medical Cooperative Program)
抄録全体を表示