A. E. Evans (1918) demonstrated that
B. abortus and
B. melitensis are hardly distinguishable either by morphological, biochemical or serological reactions. Later, Meyer & Shaw, Feusier & Meyer, Zeller, Khaled and Skaric tried to differentiate them again and confirmed that they are closely allied to each other in morphological and biological characters, but in serologica reaction they are not quite identical. Feusier & Meyer stated that they can generally be divided into four groups if an absorption test is applied.
Khaled noticed, furthermore, that, while they are in a fair agreement with each other as to the absorbing power for agglutinins from the anti-melitensis serum, the anti-abortus serum absorbed by
B. melitensis losts its power to agglutinate it, but agglutinins for
B. abortus still remain. For this reason, he suggested that the
B. melitensis should be listed under the subdivision of the
B. abortus.
Skaric suggested that the anti-serum prepared with one of these organisms has not only a single agglutinin, but also a compound agglutinin.
Thus it has been generally recognized that both organisms are identical with regard to their biological characters, but when the absorption test is applied, the results do not agree to the same effect. With 20 strains of
B. abortus which were isolated from the infected materials of cattle in this country and 2 strains of
B. melitensis and
B. abortus from hog which were brought here from England by Dr. Nakamura, I have carried out some experiments with the view of establishing all what was stated by those investigators cited above. The results obtained are summarised as follows:-
1. It is difficult to differentiate
B. abortus from
B. melitensis morphologically as biochemically.
2. Either of the anti-serums prepared with these organisms have an identical agglutination titer for the both living organisms.
3. If an antigen heated at 60° or 100°C. for an hour is used, then the anti-abortus serum agglutinates
B. abortus more powerfully than
B. melitensis. It seems to be most probable that, when the anti-abortus serum prepared with the heated antigen is the anti-melitensis serum does not show any difference in serological reaction.
4. The absorption test indicates that the agglutinins seemto be present in the immune serum in the following ratio.
A number of experiments show that the agglutinogens for AM and A are stable against heat and those for M and A' are so labile that they lost to a great extent their antigenic power by heating. It may be seen morever, that B. melitensis has two kinds of agglutinogen which differ from those of
B. abortus.
5. In the complement fixation test there is no difference between these two organisms but the antigenic power of
B. abortus appears more powerful.
6. That the abortus antigen has always stronger antigenic power than the melitensis antigen, will be an aid in the differentiation of both organisms.
7. No difference between these two organisms could be found in the precipitin reaction.
8. No difference was found between
B. abortus isolated from hog and that obtained from cattle.
9. From the foregoing,
B. melitensis may he regarded as a heterogenetic strain of
B. abortus.
View full abstract