The purpose of study was to examine the relation between personality characteristics of action control (action versus state orientation) and health behaviors. Action orientation was defined as a metastatic model of control, which facilitated the enactment of change-oriented intention. In contrast, state orientation was defined as a catastatic model of control, which preserved the status by inhibiting the enactment of change-oriented intention.
A survey was conducted in 339 university students in July, 2004. The Japanese version of the Action Control Scale (ACS90) and the health behavior check list were used. The Japanese version of ACS90 consisted of 3 subscales (“Preoccupation”, “Hesitation”, “Volatility”), and the health behavior check list consisted of 4 factors (“health care”, “well-regulated life”, “rest”, “food life”) . The logistic model was used to demonstrate for OR and 95%CI the correlation between the action-state orientation and health behaviors.
As a result, female students had been performing health behaviors about food life more than male students. In the action-state orientation, “hesitation” was related to all factors of health behaviors, and these with a tendency to be easy to put an intention into an action often performed health behaviors. In contrast, “preoccupation” was related to health cares, suggesting that the control of negative affects and the swift change of one's way of thinking were also related to health behaviors. From these results, it was suggested that health behaviors and students of the action-state orientation were related. The role of the action-state orientation should be investigated further in subjects with illness or health problems.
View full abstract