The use of wash free rice has the following advantages, that is,
1) the reduction of time spent on cooking,
2) no need of water to wash the rice, and
3) the prevention of enviromental pollution by not draining dirty water. We compared the cooking characteristics between wash free rice and usual polished rice by pysical and chemical tests in the process of washing, soaking and boiling with sensory evaruations.
We did questionnaires for wash free rice.
As a result, we found that wash free rice is superior to polished rice in the following points.
One of them is that wash free rice has fewer crushed grains after soaking and has better absobing speed and rate.
On polished rice, through observation using on electronic microscope, we found that the grains had tiny cracks on the surface, and that the cracks grew thicker and deeper after soaking. On the other hand, we found that wash free rice grains had little cracks on the surface and although that there were cracks after soaking, they were smaller than those found on polished rice grains.
We couldn't find any differences of boiled rice among the weight, water content and uniformity inside the rice cooker.
As sensory tests of cooked rice, we found it (to be) a predominance only in appearance. No differences were found among total evaluation, smell, taste, sweetness, stikiness and hardness.
Resuls from questionnaires showed that the predominance of wash free rice was it's simpleness followed by water saving, enviromental preservation and preparation for disasters.
Seventy-seven percent of respondents answered that they wouldn't purchase wash free rice by the reasons of being used without washing rice, the high cost and the concern of food additives and sanitation.
View full abstract