This clinical study reviewed intravenous sedatior for 1313 cases in 634 patients at the Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Iwate Medical University, over a period of 10 years and 6 months from July 1989 to December 1999. Patients were classified retrospectively into one of the following four groups according to the reason for sedation:Group I, comparatively major invasive surgery, although not to an extent requiring general anesthesia(n=169);Group M, medically compromised dental patients(n=296);Group D, behaviour management for disabled patients(n= 624);and Group O, other difficulties associated with dental treatment(n=341). The Dental Center for Special Patients(dentistry for the handicapped)was requested to perform intravenous sedation in the largest number of cases(612 cases), with 326 from department of oral surgery, and 317 from other institutes. The number of cases from the departments of conservative dentistry, pedodontics and prosthodontics were notably few. Administration of midazolam as the sole sedative occurred in the vast majority of cases(1109 cases). Treatment was completed within 30 mi皿tes in 642 cases. Most(559 cases)were monitored for periods of between 31 and 60 minutes. Both mean treatment time and monitoring time for Group D were significantly shorter than for other groups. In the M/T value, a sigrlificant difference was found between Groups D and M. Systemic complications were preoperatively known in 226 cases of circulatory disorders.Electrocardiogram abnormalities were noted in 86 cases, rlervous system disorders in 71, respiratory disorders in 69, and metabolic or endocrinal disorders in 55. Intraoperative complications comprised 17 cases of reduced SpO2. Four cases of restriction of the respiratory tract due to depression of the base of the tongue were noted in Group D. Postoperative complications involved nausea in 6 cases. Vomiting was noted in 2 cases。 No serious intra-or postoperative complications were noted. Of the 1313 cases,149 were admitted as in-patients. To provide the most appropriate and safe form of dental treatment to larger numbers of patients in the future requires improved consultation between departments, which in turn relies upon the provision of detailed information to these departments, particularly to the departments of conservative dentistry and prosthodontics in our hospita]、 We further recommend that the use of intravenous sedation for dental treatment be extended to use in patients requiring less invasive treatments as well as to those in good health.
View full abstract