After an event of faking earthquake-resistance design by a 1
st class architect occurred last November, a legislative bill to amend the Building Standard Law aiming at preventing the same event from happening again was submitted to the Diet on March 31. This paper introduces the outline of the bill by focusing on two legally significant issues, as well as touching on the discussion in the Council for Infrastructure.
First, it analyzes where the responsibilities lie if the newly introduced bodies for checking appropriateness of structural calculation for buildings have defects on their inspection.
Second, the paper explains background and rationality to tighten control by the designated administrative agencies (DAAs) over the designated confirmation and inspection bodies (DCIBs). In this course the decision delivered by the Supreme Court in June 2005 that the DAAs, even though it was given a limited control over the DCIBs under the current law, could satisfy eligibility for defendant stipulated in the Law concerning State Liability for Compensation regarding any defects performed by the DCIBs is also taking into account.
Other issues briefly mentioned in this paper are what a qualified architect system should be, and how defect liabilities by housing developers should be strengthened, both of which are currently under discussion.
View full abstract