Objectives : Diagnostic criteria for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 include several revisions designed to reduce the preponderance of eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) diagnoses. The most dramatic revision involves the formal recognition of binge-eating disorder (BED). This study compares DSM-Ⅳ and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria on the number of EDNOS cases and validity.
Subject and Method : Participants included 251 treatment seeking adults who met criteria for DSM-Ⅳ eating disorders. All participants completed structured clinical interviews.
Results : Using DSM-Ⅳ versus DSM-5 criteria, 49 (19.6%) versus 75 (29.9%) had anorexia nervosa, 91 (36.3%) versus 85 (33.9%) had bulimia nervosa (BN) and 93 (37.1%) had EDNOS versus 70 (27.9%) had BED and 21 (8.4%) had other specified feeding and eating disorder (OSFED)/unspecified feeding or eating disorder (UFED), respectively, reflecting a significant decrease in EDNOS. The BED group reported the highest body mass index (BMI), the mean (SD) of 24.0 (6.2) kg/m
2, among the 5 groups of DSM-5 eating disorders. “Kashoku”, the Japanese translation of binge eating in the Japanese version of DSM-5, include several eating behaviors, such as continual snacking and overeating with control over eating as well as binge-eating. Accordingly, we need a careful assessment for the complaint of “Kashoku” .
Conclusion : DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for eating disorders significantly reduced reliance on EDNOS. Boundary between non-purging BN and BED in non-obese people is an important topics for future investigation. We discussed concerns on the Japanese translation of binge-eating, “Kasyoku”, and BED, “Kasyokuseisyogai”, in the Japanese version of DSM-5.
View full abstract