Many old documents show that the Ainu in the Edo period (1603-1867), who lived on fishing, hunting, and collecting, were migratory people. And it is widely accepted that the Ainu moved seasonally from their fixed bases. This probably indicates that the residents of the bases were relatively stable. But a detailed analysis of other documents shows that many households moved their bases into other settlements in the southeastern part of Hokkaido during the years 1856-1858.
The purpose of this paper is to show that during 1856-1877 the households in the Monbetsu district of Hokkaido were open, flexible and variable in composition through inter-household movements, of its members though most of the households had fixed bases within the same settlements.
The analysis of inter-household movements was made by tracing the name, age, and kinship of each of the household members. For example, if the name of a member of household Al in 1856 was found in the list of members of household B2 in 1858, he or she was recognized as having moved from Al to B2. The kinship relationships of each member show which members of a household moved together and whether they moved for marriage or not. The documents used in the analysis are the lists of the inhabitants in 1856 1862, 1868, 1872, 1876, and 1877, which were compiled by the Japanese. The details of the findings are as follows.
In the Monbetsu district during 1856-1877, the bases of most of the households were fixed within the same settlements (Table 2), and the residents of the settlements were relatively stable (Fig. 2). But many resident members moved between households (Table 3), and about 70% of the movements were intra-settlement. The number of persons per 100 inhabitants during the 10 years who moved between households was very large in the Monbetsu and Takashima districts, but it was small in the Shizunai district and the southwestern part of Sakhalin (Table 5).
Of the 556 persons in the Monbetsu district whose names appeared in more than one list, 283 (50.9%) moved to other households once or more than once (Table 6). Such movements caused the membership of household A 31, for example, to change greatly during the period 1856-1877 (Fig. 3). The household members of A 31 were as follows:
(a 31-1, a 31-2, a 31-3, a 31-4, a 31-5), 1856
(a 31-1, a 31-5, a 14-3, a 14-4, a 26-2), 1862
(a 31-1, a 31-5, a 14-3, a 26-2, d 4-4), 1868
(a 31-1, a 31-5, a 14-3, d 4-4), 1872
(a 31-1, a 14-3, a 14-4), 1876 and 1877
_??_a 31-1, a 31-2, etc., represent individual household members._??_
During the period 1856-1877, the Monbetsu inhabitants who moved between households moved individually in most cases, rarely together (Table 6). When they moved together, they were in most cases parents and their children, especially mothers and their children (Table 8). When they moved individually, 59.6% (146/245) of them moved for marriage. 36.6% (30/82) of those cases where they moved together also involved persons who moved for marriage.
The number of persons who moved and/or stayed together all the time from 1856 to 1877 as if they were one unit was one in most cases and two to four in others (Table 7). Therefore, household membership was not stable in the Monbetsu district. The stability of the household members was much lower in the Monbetsu and Takashima districts than in the Shizunai district and the southwestern part of Sakhalin (Figs. 4 and 5).
Thus, two types of mobility were found in the Ainu society: the inter-settlement movement of households and the inter-household movement of the inhabitants.
View full abstract