In Chapter 1, the background and purpose of the research and outline of the study will be described.
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the bending performance of Glued Build-up Member (GBM). When comparing the Timber used in GBM and the lamina of Glulam, the lamina is as small as 20 to 50 mm while the lamina in the cross section direction is 105 to 180 mm in timber, and the timber used in this GBM is the point that the pith necessarily exists near the center of the cross section, the sawn timber is higher than the lamina, the distribution of the moisture content is not uniform within the lumber cross section. The influence of these features on the bending performance of GBM is not clear. In order to investigate these effects, in this paper, a bending test of a full scale GBM test specimen in which 120-150 mm square cedar timber was adhered with 2, 3, 4, 5 epoxy adhesive was carried out.
In Chapter 2, explains the test specimen, the method of experiment and the experimental results.
Cedar timber from Kumamoto prefecture, which conforms to the machine grade E70, E90, E110 of Japan Agricultural Standards and has a water content of 18% or less, was used as the test specimen. Production of test specimens was conducted according to the manufacturing method prescribed for this GBM, by selection of sawn timber, application of adhesive, clamping, curing, finishing processing. The specimen size is determined for each timber size and number of layers, the shear span a is 4.5
H or more (
H: GBM cross section height) so as to cause bending failure, the test specimen total length L is 9 m or less from the experimental dimension, The number of specimens was set to 5 or more for each sawmill. The experimental method is a two-point loading bending test, and the supporting point is the both-end pin support. We classify the failure types of specimens into five types of A, B1, B2, C and S based on load-center deflection relationship.
In Chapter 3, evaluation of experiment results will be described.
When a bending stress and bending stiffness are calculated with a uniform cross section model for each number of layers, the 5% lowest value of the bending stress is smaller than the bending strength. Moreover, the experimental value and the estimated value were about the same as the 50% lowest value of the bending stiffness. When evaluating bending stress and bending stiffness using a GBM cross section model considering the difference in elastic bending modulus of each timber, the values of bending stress and bending stiffness are both smaller than the variation of the uniform cross section model. Also, the bending stress is close to the estimated value of the strength. Therefore, it is considered that evaluation of bending performance using GBM cross section model is effective.
Using the GBM cross-section model, if the stress level of the lowermost timber is evaluated by the combination stress of the bending component and the tensile component, the combination stress becomes larger than the strength as a whole. This is considered to be due to the fact that many safety factors are expected for the tensile strength.
In Chapter 4, presents a summary of this paper.
抄録全体を表示