Higher education in Japan has arrived on the universal stage. The purposes of this paper are to empirically discover problems of the articulation between upper secondary education and higher education today, and to propose a basic design for better articulation. Two approaches are adopted to pursue this purpose. The first approach is to examine what was brought into upper secondary education by the diversification of university admissions methods and the diversification of upper secondary education which had been encouraged by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. The data used for this analysis were as follows. 1) The curricula tables of general courses of 331 upper secondary schools. 2) Curriculum frameworks and principles that organize upper secondary school curricula. 3) Subject choices of 35,662 university entrants when they were in upper secondary schools. The data were analysed in respect to admissions methods, use of scholastic tests, total numbers of credits and number of credits for elective subjects of the upper secondary school curriculum, effects of university entrance examinations on upper secondary school curriculum, and what university entrants place great importance on admissions methods and criteria. It is found that the diversification of university admissions methods and the diversification of upper secondary education lead the upper secondary schools to organize their curricula so that their students efficiently can pass university entrance examinations. The curricula now have a lack of core content and balance. The second approach is utilised to find out what cognitive skills university entrants acquired when they were upper secondary school students and what skills they need to succeed in higher education. The data were collected by sending questionnaires to university students across the country in 1999 and 2006. Twenty-six skills were listed in the questionnaire. These skills were selected from 49 Common Curriculum Elements (cognitive skills) of senior secondary school curriculum in Queensland, Australia. The students were asked what skills they think important to succeed in higher education and which skills they acquired when they were secondary students. It is found that the skills that were required more to succeed in higher education but had were less acquired at secondary schools were those in creating and presenting, structuring and sequencing, analysing, assessing and concluding. The results of the two approaches are that it is now very difficult to articulate between the upper secondary education and higher education through the present university admissions system. Further, upper secondary school curricula should be revised so that students can acquire the above skills to be successful in higher education. Performance-based assessment methods are more suitable in assessing whether an applicant has acquired those skills, and secondary school teachers play more important roles to continuously assess such skills. An articulation system is now necessary which keeps upper secondary school students out of excessive specialisation in the curriculum, provides them with a broad and balanced curriculum, and provides information on cognitive skills of the students. Such a system is one that admits students into university based on school-based assessment. Ontario, Canada and Queensland, Australia give us suggestions as university admissions systems which select applicants based on achievement in secondary school.
 View full abstract