The method of sample study gives us a very effective principle for the establishment of a new method of geography teaching. It is especially effective for our careful selection and construction of the teaching material, and for our way of teaching. Teachers, however, cannot solve all the subjects and questions by this method. Therefore, the writer examines a new method of geography teaching in the light of some criticisms and opinions which give to the method of sample study. And the writer have been putting his theory in practice, and he shows in this paper the way of suitable application of the method in the lower secondary school curriculum of geography teaching.
The worst point in the past and the present way of teaching of regional geography is that teacher's main object consisto in pursuit of regional speciality or peculiarity and he does not pay much attention to its generality or universality. This exerts an evil influence upon geography teaching, and causes the swelling of the teaching materials. As a result, students were forced to learn many pieces of knowledge by heart. One of the best ways of reshuffle in such geography teaching is to lest students find out that an area has much in common among other similar places. When they study about an area finding these common characteristics in this way, they can apply what they learned to other areas. And teachers of geography can spend their time to select carefully the materials they should teach.
When they select the materials carefully as mentioned abore, they need not spend their time on teaching fragmentary knowledge. So they can give their pupils much time to think over openly. Then they must cope with the problems of how to choose the regions they are going to teach and what points they should take highly of. These problems have much to do with the aims of geography teaching of the lower secondary school. Geography teachers must choose the regions which are helpful for the pupils to recognize land of Japan. In other words, how to recognize and how to understand our land is important; geographical point of view and geographical way of thinking is to be cultivated. Which type of the method of sample study should they take up in order to carry out these aims? The writer is helped by the theories of Stenzel, Derbolav, Knubel, Buthe, and some others for this study; and he put his idea. into his study. As a result, he understands that the objects of studying geography are different by each school or by each grade and the method of sample study should be adopted.
The lower secondary school curriculum for teaching geography is most effective when it is organized as follows:
1. Studying the district nearby
… The district in which pupils live should. be taken up as to learn the way how to study a certain area. In other words, this unit is the model of regional study.
2. Pre-study
… On the bases of the knowledge acquired in elementary school, pupils should be lead to study regional geography in order to understand the world and Japan macroscopically.
3. Studing about various regions
… Some of the first themes are better to be taught in trial and discovery study, or in fixing the aim at Knubel's “third stage”. In the next stage, it is desirable for teachers to adopt Stenzel's “four stages” in order to let them recognize and think abstractly. Comparing a region with the other simllar districts, pupils can aquire its common features, they can understand what human life is and how a man should live, and teachers can expect their pupils to re-discover themselves.
4. Japan in the world
… To let them recognize geographically what Japan is in the world. They can think of Japan profoundly from the superior geographical points of view and ways of thinking. The writer believe this is what geography teachers should attain in the lower secondary school and this is the most
View full abstract