This paper aims to categorize geographical thinking and identify its properties through an
experiment. Depending on the epistemology of humanistic geographers concerning mental
representation of a landscape, geographical thinking is a process to change a landscape as a space,
where the thinking subject doesn’t have any meaningful relationship, to a landscape as a place, where
the thinking subject has created a meaningful relationship. For the experiment, geographers were
chosen as subjects because they have a variety of geographical knowledge and carry out various
geographical thinking using that knowledge. Also in order to reveal the thinking processes of the
subjects, the Think Aloud Method was used. In the method, subjects are instructed to verbalize
everything coming into their minds as they work on a task and, in turn, their verbal protocols are
gathered and analyzed.
From the analysis of the results of the experiment, geographical thinking can be divided into two
categories. Category 1 is based on scientific, objective geographical knowledge and rational cause and
effect relationship of geography. Category 2 is based on private geographical knowledge driven by
individual preference. The properties of the two categories differ further in that Category 1 is composed
of intended and unintended parts, while Category 2 plays a role of a cognitive strategy to facilitate
Category 1.
View full abstract