The aim of this article was to undertaken observing the effect on the iontophoresis brushes for the patients of gingivitis and periodontitis. These patients were objected on the 85 persons in the three university from January to July in 1984.
The clinical parameters are used on both Gingival index (Löe & Silness) and Periodontal index (Ramfjord).
The criteria of observations consist of bacterial plaque, calculus, redness, swelling, probing depth, bleeding, pus from gingivae and mobility.
The data were analysed with multiple comparison test.
The results were obtained as follows
1. Removal of bacterial plaque.
There were no difference between the electric and non electric iontophoresis brush, but the effect recognized between the initial symptom and electric iontophoresis (p<0.05).
2. Removal of calculus.
There were no difference between the electric and non-electric iontophoresis, but results obtained on the superior non-electric iontophoresis to electric with the aging (p<0.05).
3. Disappearance of redness.
There were recognized on the effect between initial electric and non-electric iontophoresis (p<0.01), also between the symptom and electric iontophoresis (p<0.05).
4. Disappearance of swelling.
With the electric iontophoresis, initial 2 score showed the good results, on the contrary, non-electric iontophoresis 3 score showed the good results (p<0.05).
5. Reduction of probing depth.
Electric iontophoresis showed the better results compared with non electric (p<0.01).
6. Disappearance of bleeding.
Electric iontophoresis showed good results compared with non electric iontophoresis, as well as marked difference between the initial symptom and elasped time (p<0.05).
7. Disappearance of pus from gingivae.
There were no difference not only between electric and non-electric iontophoresis, but initial symptom and elasped time.
8. Roughness of bristle.
There were no difference between the 8mil and 9mil bristles.
View full abstract