This research examined the conditions necessary, for children and adult with autism and mild mental retardation, to discriminate between their own and others' knowledge situations. Participants (ages 9-20, N=3) performed well on spatial perspective-taking tasks. But they performed badly on cognitive perspective-taking tasks that examined their understanding of whether or not the participants or others knew the number of playing cards. The findings included the following. First, the skill of answering about one's own knowledge was guided by using a visual prompt-fading method. Participants learned to answer correctly about their own knowledge, but no transfer was shown to knowledge of others. Second, regarding one's and others' knowledge under different knowledge conditions (visible vs. invisible, invisible vs. visible), discrimination was guided by prompting and moving the other side. Correct answers in response to the different knowledge conditions increased, but they deceased on the same knowledge conditions (visible vs. visible, invisible vs. invisible). Third, teaching was conducted for not only different knowledge conditions, but also for the same knowledge conditions. As a result, participants learned to discriminate their own vs. others' knowledge situations, and to discriminate knowledge situations between two other people. The results were discussed in terms of teaching task conditions and teaching theory-of-mind tasks.
View full abstract