To explain biological and physical phenomena, we activate complex psychological constructs. In this research, two experiments were conducted to examine the relations between domain knowledge acquisition and reasoning schemata in explanations. In the first Experiment, 3-, 4-, 5-year-olds, and adults (total N=120), performed "explanation tasks" consisting of 4 reasoning problems translated from conditional reasoning tasks, and justifications of yes-no judgments involving familiar phenomena. These problems were embedded in familiar and realistic contexts. In Experiment 2, children of ages 5 : 0 years and 5 : 6 years, and adults (total N=90), solved same types of problems as in Experiment 1. These tasks were embedded in both familiar and unfamiliar contexts and participants also explained their judgments in detail in response to wh-questions. The results were as follows : (1) On the tasks, young children's ability to make inferences was comparable to that of the adults ; (2) Even 3-year-olds make both deductive and inductive inferences ; (3) Children's explanations were flexible and appropriate depending on differentiated domain knowledge, because young children already have domain knowledge of theories of mind, biology and physics, and the level of this knowledge improved with age ; and (4) Children's domain-specific knowledge acquisition promoted inductive and deductive inferences, based on domain-general reasoning schemata. There were two styles of adult explanations : highly elaborated through reasoning and a simple style through rote learning. Results (1) and (2) imply that reasoning schemata are domain-general, while results (3) and (4) suggest that increasing scientific knowledge has a powerful effect on the activation of both inductive and deductive reasoning.
View full abstract